share_log

The Three-year Loss for Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENT) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings

The Three-year Loss for Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENT) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings

中央花园及宠物(纳斯达克:CENT)股东的三年亏损可能是由其萎缩的收益驱动
Simply Wall St ·  10/30 19:31

As an investor its worth striving to ensure your overall portfolio beats the market average. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. We regret to report that long term Central Garden & Pet Company (NASDAQ:CENT) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 35% in three years, versus a market return of about 20%. Furthermore, it's down 13% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders.

作为投资者,努力确保您的整体投资组合击败市场平均水平是值得的。但几乎可以肯定,有时您会买入表现不及市场平均水平的股票。很遗憾的是,长期持有Central Garden & Pet Company(纳斯达克:CENT)的股东们有过这样的经历,股价在三年内下跌了35%,而市场回报率约为20%。此外,股价在大约一个季度内下跌了13%。这对持有者来说并不令人愉快。

On a more encouraging note the company has added US$76m to its market cap in just the last 7 days, so let's see if we can determine what's driven the three-year loss for shareholders.

更令人鼓舞的是,这家公司在过去7天内市值增加了7600万美元,让我们看看能否判断是什么导致了股东们三年的损失。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

不可否认的是,市场有时是高效的,但价格并不总是反映潜在的商业表现。一个不完美但简单的方法来考虑公司市场感知如何改变是比较每股收益(EPS)变化和股价变动。

During the three years that the share price fell, Central Garden & Pet's earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 12% each year. This change in EPS is reasonably close to the 13% average annual decrease in the share price. That suggests that the market sentiment around the company hasn't changed much over that time, despite the disappointment. Rather, the share price has approximately tracked EPS growth.

在股价下跌的三年中,Central Garden & Pet的每股收益(EPS)每年下降了12%。这种EPS的变化与股价每年下跌13%的平均值相当接近。这表明尽管令人失望,但围绕该公司的市场情绪在此期间并未发生太大变化。相反,股价大致跟踪了EPS的增长。

The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下图显示了EPS随时间变化的情况(点击图像以显示确切值)。

big
NasdaqGS:CENT Earnings Per Share Growth October 30th 2024
纳斯达克GS:CENt 每股收益增长于2024年10月30日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here..

我们很高兴地宣布,该公司的CEO获得的薪酬比同样规模的公司的大多数CEO获得的薪酬更加适度。但是,在购买或出售股票之前,我们始终建议仔细审查公司历史增长趋势,这些历史增长趋势可以在这里获得。真正重要的问题是这家公司未来能否增长收益。

What About Dividends?

关于分红派息的问题

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, Central Garden & Pet's TSR for the last 3 years was -17%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

考虑任何给定股票的股东总回报以及股价回报是很重要的。 股价回报仅反映股价的变化,而TSR包括分红价值(假设它们被再投资)以及任何折价资本筹集或剥离的好处。 可以说TSR为支付股息的股票提供了更全面的图片。 恰好, 中央花园与宠物过去3年的TSR为-17%,超过了前面提到的股价回报。 毫无疑问,分红支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧!

A Different Perspective

另一种看法

Central Garden & Pet shareholders gained a total return of 1.4% during the year. But that was short of the market average. On the bright side, the longer term returns (running at about 7% a year, over half a decade) look better. Maybe the share price is just taking a breather while the business executes on its growth strategy. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Even so, be aware that Central Garden & Pet is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

中央花园与宠物股东在该年度获得总回报率为1.4%。 但这低于市场平均水平。 正面的是,长期回报(在大约半个十年内约为7%)看起来更好。 也许股价只是在商业执行其增长策略期间稍事休整。 我发现长期来看股价作为业务表现的一种代理变化非常有趣。 但要真正获得深入洞察,我们也需要考虑其他信息。 即使如此,请注意,我们的投资分析显示中央花园与宠物出现了1个警示信号,您应该了解...

If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of undervalued small caps that insiders are buying.

如果您和我一样,那么您一定不想错过这份免费的被内部人员买入的低估小盘股清单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发