Investors in SIA Engineering (SGX:S59) Have Unfortunately Lost 5.5% Over the Last Five Years
Investors in SIA Engineering (SGX:S59) Have Unfortunately Lost 5.5% Over the Last Five Years
Ideally, your overall portfolio should beat the market average. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. So we wouldn't blame long term SIA Engineering Company Limited (SGX:S59) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 14% over a half decade.
理想情况下,您的整体投资组合应超过市场平均水平。但是,几乎每个投资者都肯定会有表现过硬和表现不佳的股票。因此,我们不会责怪新航工程有限公司(SGX: S59)的长期股东怀疑他们的持股决定,该股在五年内下跌了14%。
It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.
值得评估的是,该公司的经济状况是否与这些令人难以置信的股东回报步调一致,或者两者之间是否存在一些差距。所以我们就这么做吧。
There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
不可否认,市场有时是有效的,但价格并不总是能反映潜在的业务表现。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。
During the five years over which the share price declined, SIA Engineering's earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 8.6% each year. The share price decline of 3% per year isn't as bad as the EPS decline. The relatively muted share price reaction might be because the market expects the business to turn around.
在股价下跌的五年中,新航工程的每股收益(EPS)每年下降8.6%。股价每年下跌3%,没有每股收益的下降那么严重。股价反应相对平淡,可能是因为市场预计业务将好转。
You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).
你可以在下面看到 EPS 是如何随着时间的推移而变化的(点击图片发现确切的值)。
It is of course excellent to see how SIA Engineering has grown profits over the years, but the future is more important for shareholders. If you are thinking of buying or selling SIA Engineering stock, you should check out this FREE detailed report on its balance sheet.
看到SIA Engineering多年来如何增加利润当然是件好事,但未来对股东来说更为重要。如果您正在考虑买入或卖出新航工程股票,则应在其资产负债表上查看这份免费的详细报告。
What About Dividends?
分红呢?
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, SIA Engineering's TSR for the last 5 years was -5.5%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
重要的是要考虑任何给定股票的股东总回报率和股价回报率。基于股息再投资的假设,股东总回报率纳入了任何分拆或贴现资本筹集的价值以及任何股息。可以说,股东总回报率更全面地描述了股票产生的回报。碰巧的是,新航工程过去5年的股东总回报率为-5.5%,超过了前面提到的股价回报率。因此,公司支付的股息提高了股东的总回报率。
A Different Perspective
不同的视角
SIA Engineering provided a TSR of 10% over the last twelve months. Unfortunately this falls short of the market return. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 1.1% per year, over five years. So this might be a sign the business has turned its fortunes around. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks, for example - SIA Engineering has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
在过去的十二个月中,新航工程提供的股东回报率为10%。不幸的是,这没有达到市场回报率。但至少这还是个好处!在过去的五年中,股东总回报率在五年内每年下降1.1%。因此,这可能表明该企业已经扭转了命运。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,冒险吧——新航工程有 1 个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。
But note: SIA Engineering may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).
但请注意:新航工程可能不是最值得购买的股票。因此,来看看这份过去盈利增长(以及进一步增长预测)的有趣公司的免费清单。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Singaporean exchanges.
请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在新加坡交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。