Insiders Own 29% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Shares but Retail Investors Control 36% of the Company
Insiders Own 29% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Shares but Retail Investors Control 36% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over iFAST by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 55% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- 29% of iFAST is held by insiders
- 零售投资者对奕丰集团的重大控制意味着普通公众对管理和治理相关决策有更大的影响力
- 前4大股东持有55%的业务。
- 奕丰集团有29%的股权由内部持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of iFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制着新加坡交易所奕丰集团有限公司(AIY),重要的是了解该企业的所有权结构。持有最大股份的是零售投资者,占36%。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的向上潜力(或向下风险)。
And individual insiders on the other hand have a 29% ownership in the company. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.
另一方面,个人内部人士在公司中拥有29%的股权。一般来说,随着公司的成长,机构会增加他们的持股。相反,内部人士通常会随时间减少他们的持股。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about iFAST.
让我们更仔细地看看不同类型股东对奕丰集团能告诉我们什么。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iFAST?
机构持股告诉我们关于奕丰集团的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in iFAST. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at iFAST's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在奕丰集团中拥有相当大比例的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定可信度。然而,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变他们对某只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此值得查看下方奕丰集团的收入历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in iFAST. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chung Chun Lim with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 17% and 12%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对于奕丰集团,对冲基金持有的股份不多。根据我们的数据,最大股东是CEO钟振霖,持有19%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有17%和12%的股份。
On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步查看,我们发现前4大股东拥有该公司55%的股份。换言之,这些股东对公司的决策有着重要的影响。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of iFAST
奕丰集团的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of iFAST Corporation Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just S$2.2b, and insiders have S$640m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人士拥有奕丰集团有限公司的相当比例。市值仅为22亿新加坡元,内部人士名下持有64000万新加坡元的股份。这相当可观。看到这种投资水平是好事。您可以在这里检查,看看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in iFAST. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般大众,通常是个人投资者,在奕丰集团持有36%的股份。虽然这个群体不能确定一切,但肯定会对公司的经营产生实质影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the iFAST stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
私人公司似乎拥有奕丰集团13%的股份。 仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得进一步研究拥有这些私人公司的人。有时内部人员或其他相关方通过单独的私人公司持有上市公司股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。