With 86% Ownership, PPG Industries, Inc. (NYSE:PPG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 86% Ownership, PPG Industries, Inc. (NYSE:PPG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, PPG Industries' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 考虑到机构在股票中所占的大比例,ppg工业的股票价格可能会受到他们交易决策的影响
- 前十六大股东持有该公司51%的股权。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
If you want to know who really controls PPG Industries, Inc. (NYSE:PPG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着ppg工业公司(纽交所:PPG),那么你必须看看其股权登记簿的构成。 以86%的持股比例,机构在公司中拥有最大的股份。 也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获益最大(或者在出现下跌时损失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of PPG Industries, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究ppg工业每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PPG Industries?
机构持股告诉我们有关ppg工业的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PPG Industries. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see PPG Industries' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所见,机构投资者在ppg工业中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经查看过这只股票,他们对其感兴趣。但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错误的。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总会存在一种风险,即它们是在一个'拥挤的交易'中。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以看到ppg工业的历史收益和营收,但请记住故事总是更复杂的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. PPG Industries is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.9% and 5.1% of the stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会很可能需要关注他们的偏好。PPG工业不是对冲基金拥有的。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有12%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约8.9%和5.1%的股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前16名股东在该公司的拥有权占比为51%,这意味着没有单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of PPG Industries
PPG工业的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that PPG Industries, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$65m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,ppg工业公司的内部持有不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此如果内部持有公司的大比例会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股不到1%,我们可以看到董事会成员共同拥有价值6500万美元的股份(以当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买卖情况同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,包括散户投资者,拥有该公司14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PPG Industries better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for PPG Industries you should be aware of.
考虑到公司的股东,总是值得思考的。但要更好地了解ppg工业,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。说到这一点:我们发现 ppg工业 存在 1个警告信号,您应该知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。