Institutional Investors in Alerus Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:ALRS) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Institutional Investors in Alerus Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:ALRS) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Alerus Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 20 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构在alerus financial的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股价具有重大影响
- 总共有20位股东持有该公司的50%股权
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Alerus Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:ALRS) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 49% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下alerus financial corporation(纳斯达克:alrs)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。 机构持有该公司49%的股份,持股数量最大。 换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$469m last week. However, the 22% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
上周公司市值下降至46900万美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。然而,股东们获得的22%的一年回报可能有助于减轻他们的损失。然而,我们可能会假设他们将密切关注未来的弱点。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Alerus Financial.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于alerus financial的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alerus Financial?
机构持股告诉我们关于Alerus Financial的什么信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Alerus Financial. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Alerus Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Alerus Financial拥有相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得查看Alerus Financial下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Alerus Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Alerus Financial Corp., Asset Management Arm with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 4.7% of the company stock.
alerus financial不被对冲基金拥有。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是alerus financial公司,资产管理部门持有11%的股份。第二大股东是黑石集团,拥有8.5%的普通股,而先锋集团持有该公司股份的约4.7%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记表,我们可以看到前20名股东控制着50%的股权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有大多数股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Alerus Financial
alerus financial的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Alerus Financial Corporation. In their own names, insiders own US$32m worth of stock in the US$469m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根据我们最新的数据,内部人士拥有Alerus Financial Corporation的部分股份。在他们自己的名义下,内部人士拥有价值3200万美元的股票,占据了总市值46900万美元的公司。这至少显示出了某种程度的一致性。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Alerus Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
作为持有40%股份的,一般公众,主要是个人投资者,对Alerus Financial有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不能一言九鼎,但肯定能在公司的运行方式上产生实质性影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Alerus Financial has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我发现查看公司所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。举个例子,看风险- alerus financial有2个警示标志,我们认为你应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。