With 73% Institutional Ownership, The Wharf (Holdings) Limited (HKG:4) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 73% Institutional Ownership, The Wharf (Holdings) Limited (HKG:4) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Wharf (Holdings)'s stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- Wheelock and Company Limited owns 68% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 考虑到机构在股票中持有的大部分股份,会德丰的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响
- Wheelock及其有限公司拥有该公司68%的股份
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls The Wharf (Holdings) Limited (HKG:4), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道真正控制着会德丰控股有限公司(HKG:4)的是谁,那么你需要查看其股东登记簿的构成。机构持有73%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群体。换句话说,这个集团将从对该公司的投资中获得最大利润(或损失)
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Wharf (Holdings).
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于九龙仓(集团)的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wharf (Holdings)?
机构持股告诉我们关于九龙仓(集团)的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Wharf (Holdings) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Wharf (Holdings)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到九龙仓(集团)确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经看过这支股票,而且他们喜欢。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果多个机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看九龙仓(集团)下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Wharf (Holdings). Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Wheelock and Company Limited with 68% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 1.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.9% by the third-largest shareholder.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有该公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体施加重要影响力。对于和黄(控股)来说,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是会德丰公司,占已发行股份的68%。由于他们在所有权中拥有如此庞大的股份,我们推断他们对公司未来有着重要的控制。值得一提的是,第二大股东持有约1.3%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有0.9%的股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Wharf (Holdings)
和黄(控股)的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of The Wharf (Holdings) Limited. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own HK$144m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有不到1%的九龙仓(集团)有限公司股份。作为一家大公司,我们只希望内部持有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他们持有价值14400万港元的股份。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Wharf (Holdings). While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个体投资者,在九龙仓(集团)持有27%的股份。虽然这个群体不能直接决定事情,但他们确实会对公司的经营产生实质影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。