NewMarket (NYSE:NEU) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
NewMarket (NYSE:NEU) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性与风险远非同义词。” 因此,当您考虑一只股票有多大风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会拖垮一家公司。与许多其他公司一样,newmarket公司(纽交所:NEU)利用债务。 但真正的问题在于,这笔债务是否使公司变得更加危险。
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
当一家企业无法轻松用自由现金流或以有吸引力的价格筹集资金时,债务和其他负债会变得风险很高。 资本主义的一大特点是“创造性毁灭”,失败的企业常常被银行残酷清算。 虽然这并不常见,但我们经常看到负债累累的公司因为债权人迫使它们以低价筹集资金而不断稀释股东。 当然,债务可以是企业的重要工具,尤其是对于资本密集型企业。 在考虑一家企业使用了多少债务时,首先要看其现金和债务合计。
What Is NewMarket's Debt?
newmarket的债务是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 NewMarket had US$1.09b of debt, an increase on US$779.4m, over one year. However, it also had US$80.3m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.00b.
您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,但数据显示截至2024年9月,newmarket的债务为10.9亿美元,比去年增加了77940万美元。 然而,它也有8030万美元的现金,因此其净债务为10亿美元。
A Look At NewMarket's Liabilities
了解newmarket的负债
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that NewMarket had liabilities of US$402.0m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.40b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$80.3m in cash and US$487.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.23b.
深入研究最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到,newmarket在12个月内到期的负债为40200万美元,而超过12个月到期的负债为14亿美元。 抵消这一点,它有8030万美元的现金和48760万美元的应收账款在12个月内到期。 因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款的总和12.3亿美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since NewMarket has a market capitalization of US$5.04b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
虽然这可能看起来很多,但并不算太糟,因为newmarket的市值为50.4亿美元,因此如果有需要,它可能通过增加资本来加强资产负债表。 但很明显,我们绝对应该仔细研究它是否能够在不稀释的情况下管理其债务。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比以及计算其利息支出由收益前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖的程度来度量一家公司的债务负载相对于其收益能力的程度。此方法的优点在于我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(以净债务为EBITDA)以及与该债务相关的实际利息支出(以其利息覆盖倍数计算)。
NewMarket's net debt is only 1.4 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 11.4 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Also good is that NewMarket grew its EBIT at 14% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since NewMarket will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
newmarket的净债务仅为其EBITDA的1.4倍。 而其EBIt轻松覆盖了利息费用,规模为11.4倍。 因此,我们对其超保守的债务使用非常放心。 此外,值得一提的是,newmarket过去一年将其EBIt增长了14%,进一步增加了其管理债务的能力。 当您分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要重点关注的地方。 但您不能孤立地看待债务;因为newmarket需要盈利来偿还债务。 因此,如果您渴望了解更多关于其盈利的信息,不妨查看其长期盈利趋势的图表。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, NewMarket produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 61% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最后,尽管税务人员可能喜欢会计利润,但放贷人只接受冰冷的现金。 因此,值得检查有多少EBIt是由自由现金流支持的。 在过去三年中,newmarket产生稳健的自由现金流,相当于其EBIt的61%,这正是我们所期待的。 这种自由现金流使公司具备了偿还债务的良好位置,情况适当时可以利用。
Our View
我们的观点
Happily, NewMarket's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And its EBIT growth rate is good too. Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that NewMarket takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for NewMarket you should be aware of.
令人欣喜的是,newmarket的优越利息保障意味着它在债务方面具有优势。而且它的EBIt增长率也很不错。考虑到所有这些数据,我们认为newmarket对待债务的方式相当明智。虽然这带来了一些风险,但也可以增加股东的回报。毫无疑问,我们大多数关于债务的了解都来自资产负债表。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中-远非如此。一个案例证明:我们已经发现了newmarket的2个警示信号,您应该注意。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天结束时,通常更好地关注那些没有净债务的公司。您可以查看我们特别名单上的这些公司(所有这些公司都有盈利增长记录)。这是免费的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。