Great Week for Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Institutional Investors After Losing 37% Over the Previous Year
Great Week for Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Institutional Investors After Losing 37% Over the Previous Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Transocean's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构持股比例高意味着Transocean的股价对他们的交易行为敏感
- 前8大股东拥有该公司的51%。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 75% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解Transocean Ltd.(NYSE:RIG)的真正控制者是谁,重要的是要了解该企业的所有权结构。 机构拥有75%的股份,是公司中持有最多股份的群体。也就是说,如果股价上涨(或者如果出现下滑),这个群体将获益最多(或者损失最大)。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 4.8% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 37%.
机构投资者对上周股价上涨4.8%表示赞赏,因为他们一年的亏损累计达到了令人失望的37%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Transocean.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对Transocean有什么启发。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Transocean?
机构投资者持有Transocean的较高比例表明他们对该公司充满信心,这对专业投资者来说是一个很好的信号。但是,我们不能仅凭这一事实进行判断,因为机构有时也会犯错误,就像其他人一样。如果两大机构投资者同时试图出售股票,很可能会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得注意的是检查Transocean的过去收益率曲线(如下)。当然,还要考虑其他因素。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Transocean already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Transocean's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Transocean已经有机构们在其股东名册上。确实,他们在这家公司持有一定比例的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总是存在它们可能会涉及到'拥挤交易'的风险。当这种交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在一个没有成长历史的公司中,这种风险会更高。您可以在下面看到Transocean的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事还有更多内容。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Transocean is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Perestroika AS is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 8.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Jeremy Thigpen is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.
投资者应该注意,实际上机构拥有公司超过一半的股权,因此他们可以集体行使重要权力。Transocean并不是由对冲基金拥有。我们的数据显示,Perestroika AS是最大的股东,持有10%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约8.4%和8.1%的股份。此外,首席执行官Jeremy Thigpen拥有公司股份的0.6%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Transocean
一般公众持有Transocean的21%股份。尽管拥有相当数量的股份,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Transocean Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$52m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股东可能会对得知Transocean Ltd.的内部持股感兴趣。 这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到潜在的巨大利益关联通常是积极的。 在这种情况下,他们持有价值约5200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。 看到这些内部人士投资的水平是一个好现象。 您可以在这里查看内部人士最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Transocean. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有13%股权的普通大众,主要是由个人投资者构成,对Transocean有一定的影响力。 尽管这个团体不一定能左右决策,但它肯定会对公司的运行产生实质影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 10%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到,私人公司拥有发行股份的10%。光凭这个事实本身很难得出任何结论,所以值得进一步了解谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方通过另一家私人公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Transocean that you should be aware of.
尽管考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。 例如,我们已经确定了您应该注意的transocean的1个警示信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。