While Individual Investors Own 18% of Jack Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603337), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 59% Ownership
While Individual Investors Own 18% of Jack Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603337), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 59% Ownership
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over Jack TechnologyLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 59% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- 13% of Jack TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
- 私营公司对Jack TechnologyLtd的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
- 59% 的业务由前两位股东持有
- Jack TechnologyLtd 13% 的股份由机构持有
A look at the shareholders of Jack Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603337) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 59% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看杰克科技公司的股东, Ltd(上海证券交易所代码:603337)可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有59%所有权的私营公司。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And individual investors on the other hand have a 18% ownership in the company.
另一方面,个人投资者拥有该公司18%的所有权。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Jack TechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究Jack TechnologyLtd的每种所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jack TechnologyLtd?
关于Jack TechnologyLtd,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
Jack TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Jack TechnologyLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Jack TechnologyLtd已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Jack TechnologyLtd的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jack TechnologyLtd. Taizhou Jack Trading Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 41% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 18% and 4.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Ji Xiang Ruan, the CEO has 0.6% of the shares allocated to their name.
我们注意到,对冲基金对Jack TechnologyLtd没有进行有意义的投资。台州杰克贸易有限公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的41%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的18%和4.1%。此外,我们发现首席执行官阮吉祥拥有0.6%的股份以他们的名义分配。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Jack TechnologyLtd
杰克科技有限公司的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Jack Technology Co.,Ltd. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥1.3b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有杰克科技公司的股份。, Ltd. 这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意义的调整通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约13元人民币的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Jack TechnologyLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Jack TechnologyLtd拥有18%的所有权,公众对Jack TechnologyLtd拥有一定程度的影响力,主要是个人投资者。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 59%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的59%。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Jack TechnologyLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Jack TechnologyLtd has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解杰克科技有限公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。举个风险吧——Jack TechnologyLtd 有 1 个我们认为你应该注意的警告标志。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。