Lakala Payment Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300773) Stock Price Dropped 9.3% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy
Lakala Payment Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300773) Stock Price Dropped 9.3% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Lakala Payment by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
- Insider ownership in Lakala Payment is 13%
- 个人投资者对拉卡拉支付的重要控制意味着普通公众更有权力影响管理和治理相关决策
- 前25大股东拥有该公司的49%。
- 拉卡拉支付内部持股比例为13%
Every investor in Lakala Payment Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300773) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
投资拉卡拉支付股票的每位投资者(SZSE:300773)都应注意最强大的股东群体。 公司中持有最多股份的群体,具体来说约为51%,是个人投资者。 换句话说,该群体在投资公司时可以获得最多利益(或损失最多)。
And following last week's 9.3% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.
在上周股价下跌了9.3%之后,个人投资者遭受了最大的损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lakala Payment.
在下面的图表中,我们将放大拉卡拉支付的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lakala Payment?
机构所有权告诉我们有关拉卡拉支付的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lakala Payment. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lakala Payment's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在拉卡拉支付中持有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错误。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总是有它们会被卷入‘人满为患的交易’的风险。当这样的交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。你可以查看拉卡拉支付的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更加复杂的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lakala Payment. The company's largest shareholder is Legend Holdings Corporation, with ownership of 27%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.8% by the third-largest shareholder. Sun Taoran, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of President.
对拉卡拉支付没有太多股票的对冲基金。该公司最大的股东是联想控股有限公司,持有27%的股份。为了更好地理解,第二大股东持有约10%的流通股份,第三大股东持有2.8%的股份。第二大股东孙韬然也是总裁。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Lakala Payment
拉卡拉支付的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Lakala Payment Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥16b, and insiders have CN¥2.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根据我们最近的数据,内部持有者拥有拉卡拉支付有限公司相当大的比例。它只有160亿人民币的总市值,内部持有者自己的股票价值20亿人民币。这相当重要。大多数人会说,这显示出与股东有很好的一致性,尤其是在这样规模的公司。您可以单击这里查看这些内部持有者是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 51% stake in Lakala Payment, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
一般民众,通常是个人投资者,在拉卡拉支付中持有51%的股份,这表明这是一只相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权规模赋予一般民众投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以并可能确实影响执行薪酬、股息政策和拟议的业务收购决定。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 27% of Lakala Payment stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
目前公共公司持有拉卡拉支付27%的股票。 这可能是一项战略利益,这两家公司可能有相关的业务利益。 可能是它们已经分拆了。 这种持有可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Lakala Payment you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。 试举一例:我们已经发现 拉卡拉支付 存在3个警示信号,您应该注意其中1个是重要的。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。