share_log

MLOptic's (SHSE:688502) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear

MLOptic's (SHSE:688502) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear

MLOptic(上海证券交易所:688502)的业绩疲软可能比表面看起来更糟糕
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/02 08:33

Investors were disappointed with MLOptic Corp.'s (SHSE:688502) recent earnings. We think there is more to the story than simply soft profit numbers. Our analysis shows that there are some other factors of concern.

投资者对MLOptic公司(SHSE:688502)最近的收益感到失望。我们认为这个故事并不仅仅是利润数字较低。我们的分析显示还有一些其他令人担忧的因素。

big
SHSE:688502 Earnings and Revenue History November 2nd 2024
SHSE:688502的收益和营业收入历史数据为2024年11月2日

Zooming In On MLOptic's Earnings

聚焦MLOptic的收益情况

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

作为财务迷已经了解的,现金流的应计比率是评估公司自由现金流(FCF)与利润匹配情况的关键指标。为了得到应计比率,我们首先要从一个时期的利润中减去FCF,然后将这个数字除以该时期的平均营运资产。你可以将现金流的应计比率视为“非FCF的获利比例”。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,当公司的应计比率为负时,实际上是一件好事,但如果其应计比率为正,则是一件坏事。虽然应计比率为零以上的事情无关紧要,但我们认为当公司的应计比率相对较高时,值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年发表的一篇论文:“应计越高的公司未来利润率越低”。

For the year to September 2024, MLOptic had an accrual ratio of 0.42. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥34.9m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥292m in the last year. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of CN¥292m, this year, indicates high risk. However, that's not all there is to consider. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.

截至2024年9月份,MLOptic的应计比率为0.42。通常情况下,这对未来的盈利来说不乐观。而事实上,在这段时期内,该公司根本没有产生任何自由现金流。即使报告显示盈利为3490万人民币,但自由现金流的数据表明,在过去一年中它实际上亏损了29200万元人民币。在去年出现负自由现金流之后,我们可以想象一些股东可能会怀疑,今年2.92亿元人民币的现金烧损是否表明高风险。然而,并不是所有的事情只看这些。应计比率反映了非正常项目对法定盈利的影响,至少在一定程度上。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让您想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于其估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

除了稀释之外,还应该注意的是,万集科技在过去12个月中因不寻常项目获得了价值人民币3.5万元的利润。虽然我们希望看到利润增加,但当这些不寻常项目对利润做出重大贡献时,我们会更加谨慎。我们对全球大部分上市公司的数据进行了分析,发现不寻常项目往往是一次性的。这正如我们所期望的那样,因为这些提升被描述为"不寻常"。相对于其利润而言,万集科技在2021年12月前的不寻常项目贡献大。因此,我们可以推断出,这些不寻常项目正在使其财务利润显著增强。

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by CN¥6.4m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. If MLOptic doesn't see that contribution repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to drop over the current year.

公司上一年扶持营业收入640万人民币的飞凡项目是事实,这可能部分解释了其应计比率如此疲弱的原因。我们无法否认,更高的利润通常让我们感到乐观,但我们更希望利润能够持续。我们对全球大多数上市公司进行了数据分析,飞凡项目一次性的特性是非常普遍的。鉴于其名字,这并不奇怪。如果MLOptic未能看到该贡献再现,那么其他条件相等的情况下,我们预计其利润在当前年度将会下降。

Our Take On MLOptic's Profit Performance

我们对MLOptic的利润表现持怀疑态度

MLOptic had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. Considering all this we'd argue MLOptic's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for MLOptic you should be aware of.

MLOptic的应计比率较低,但其利润确实受益于飞凡项目。考虑到这一切,我们认为MLOptic的利润可能过分夸大了其可持续盈利水平。基于这一点,除非我们对风险有透彻的了解,否则我们不会考虑投资于该股。举例说明:我们已发现MLOptic存在2个警示信号,您应该注意。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

在本文中,我们已经查看了许多影响利润数据实用性的因素,并对此持谨慎态度。但是,还有许多其他方法可以了解公司的情况。例如,许多人认为高股权回报率是企业经济有利的指标,而其他人则喜欢“跟着钱”的思路,并寻找内部人员购买的股票。虽然这可能需要一些您自己的研究,但是您可能会发现这个由高股权回报率的公司组成的免费集合,或者这个拥有重要内部人员持股的股票列表有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发