Fulton Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:FULT) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.3% Over the Past Week
Fulton Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:FULT) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.3% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Fulton Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 考虑到机构在该股票中持有的大部分股份,富尔顿金融的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前十大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Fulton Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:FULT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 77% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看富尔顿金融公司(纳斯达克:FULT)的股东,就能告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。持有公司最多股份的群体,确切地说约占77%的股份,是机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$3.3b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 33%.
上周,机构投资者从公司市值达到33亿美元中受益最多。上周的收益将进一步提高股东的一年回报率,目前为33%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Fulton Financial.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关富尔顿金融的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fulton Financial?
机构投资者的持股告诉我们有关富尔顿金融的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Fulton Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fulton Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到富尔顿金融确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的一大部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这个事实就依赖,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总存在一种风险,即它们可能处于“拥挤交易”中。当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以查看富尔顿金融的历史收入和营业额,但请记住故事并不仅仅是这些。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Fulton Financial. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.6% of the stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过半数已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对富尔顿金融来说,对冲基金持有的股份不多。我们的数据显示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股东,持有14%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有大约12%和6.6%的股票。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前10大股东持有超过半数股份,有一些较小的股东以一定程度上平衡更大股东的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Fulton Financial
富尔顿金融的内部股权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Fulton Financial Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$37m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
根据我们最新的数据显示,内部持有者在富尔顿金融公司持有一些股份。内部持有者持有价值3700万美元的股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极信号。大多数人会说,这显示了股东和董事会之间利益的一致性。不过,值得检查一下这些内部持有者是否一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Fulton Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众通常是个人投资者,在富尔顿金融持有21%的股份。虽然这种所有权比例可能不足以影响他们利益的决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fulton Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Fulton Financial has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解富尔顿金融,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,要考虑风险- 富尔顿金融有1个警告标志,我们认为您应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。