Longshine Technology Group (SZSE:300682) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
Longshine Technology Group (SZSE:300682) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. However, after investigating Longshine Technology Group (SZSE:300682), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
如果我们想找到一只能够长期增值的股票,那么我们应该关注哪些基本趋势?通常,我们希望注意到资本回报率(ROCE)增长的趋势,以及资本投入的基础不断扩大。这表明这是一台复利机器,能够持续将收益再投资于业务中并产生更高的回报。然而,在调查朗新科技(SZSE:300682)后,我们认为其当前趋势并不符合多倍收益的标准。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
上面您可以看到蒙托克可再生能源现行ROCE与之前资本回报的比较,但过去只能知道这么多。如果您感兴趣,可以查看我们免费的蒙托克可再生能源分析师报告,了解分析师的预测。
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Longshine Technology Group:
对于那些不知道的人来说,ROCE 是公司年度税前利润(其回报)相对于投入到业务中的资本的衡量标准。分析师使用这个公式来计算朗新科技的ROCE:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)
0.04 = CN¥329m ÷ (CN¥10b - CN¥1.9b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.04 = CN¥32900万 ÷ (CN¥100亿 - CN¥1.9b) (基于截至2024年9月的过去十二个月的数据)。
So, Longshine Technology Group has an ROCE of 4.0%. On its own that's a low return, but compared to the average of 2.7% generated by the Software industry, it's much better.
因此,朗新科技的ROCE为4.0%。就其自身而言,这是一个较低的回报,但与软件行业平均2.7%的回报相比,这要好得多。
In the above chart we have measured Longshine Technology Group's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Longshine Technology Group for free.
在以上图表中,我们测量了朗新科技过去的资本回报率与其过去的表现,但未来或许更为重要。如果您愿意,可以免费查看覆盖朗新科技的分析师提供的预测。
How Are Returns Trending?
综合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其资本利用率所产生的回报。考虑到股票过去五年保持稳定,如果其他指标也不错,则可能存在机会。因此,进一步研究这家公司并确定这些趋势是否会持续是合理的。
We weren't thrilled with the trend because Longshine Technology Group's ROCE has reduced by 46% over the last five years, while the business employed 97% more capital. Usually this isn't ideal, but given Longshine Technology Group conducted a capital raising before their most recent earnings announcement, that would've likely contributed, at least partially, to the increased capital employed figure. It's unlikely that all of the funds raised have been put to work yet, so as a consequence Longshine Technology Group might not have received a full period of earnings contribution from it.
我们对这一趋势并不满意,因为朗新科技的资本回报率在过去五年中降低了46%,而业务使用的资本增加了97%。通常这并不理想,但考虑到朗新科技在最近的财报发布前进行了资本筹集,这可能在一定程度上导致了增加的资本使用数字。很可能所有筹集的资金尚未投入,因此朗新科技可能没有完全获得这一资金带来的收益贡献。
The Bottom Line On Longshine Technology Group's ROCE
关于朗新科技资本回报率的结论
To conclude, we've found that Longshine Technology Group is reinvesting in the business, but returns have been falling. And in the last five years, the stock has given away 23% so the market doesn't look too hopeful on these trends strengthening any time soon. Therefore based on the analysis done in this article, we don't think Longshine Technology Group has the makings of a multi-bagger.
总之,我们发现朗新科技正在对业务进行再投资,但收益却在下降。在过去五年中,股票回报率下降了23%,因此市场对这些趋势短期内增强并不是很乐观。因此,基于本文所做的分析,我们认为朗新科技不具备成为多倍收益股的潜质。
One more thing to note, we've identified 2 warning signs with Longshine Technology Group and understanding these should be part of your investment process.
还有一点需要注意,我们发现朗新科技有2个警示信号,了解这些应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
While Longshine Technology Group may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
尽管朗新科技目前可能无法获得最高的回报,但我们已汇编出一个目前获得超过25%股本回报率的公司列表。请在这里查看这个免费列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。