With 60% Ownership in Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRCH), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 60% Ownership in Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRCH), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Porch Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 21% of Porch Group
- 机构持有Porch Group的大量股份意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响
- 该公司共有8个股东拥有51%的股权。
- 内部持有Porch Group 21%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRCH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解真正控制Porch Group, Inc. (纳斯达克:PRCH)的人,重要的是了解业务的所有权结构。 拥有公司最多股份的是机构,准确地说是约60%。 也就是说,如果股价上涨(或者出现下行),这一组织将获益最多(或者损失最大)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 73% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 226%.
结果,上周公司股价上涨73%,机构投资者从中获得了最大的回报。上周的收益将进一步提高股东的一年回报,目前为226%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Porch Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究Porch Group的每一种所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Porch Group?
机构持股告诉我们关于Porch Group的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Porch Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Porch Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,Porch Group确实有机构投资者,并持有公司股票的大部分。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且喜欢它。但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能错了。当多家机构持有一只股票时,始终存在一种风险,即他们的交易可能过于拥挤。当这种交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Porch Group的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事不止如此。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Porch Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Matthew Ehrlichman is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.8% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由于机构投资者拥有超过发行股票的一半,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。Porch Group不是对冲基金持有的。公司首席执行官马修·厄利希曼持有19%的流通股,是最大的股东。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的9.8%和5.0%。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进一步了解,前8大股东持有该公司约51%的注册股份,这意味着除了更大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Porch Group
Porch Group的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Porch Group, Inc.. Insiders own US$46m worth of shares in the US$222m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人员拥有Porch Group,Inc.相当比例的股份。内部人员在这家价值22200万美元的公司中拥有4600万美元的股份。我们会说这显示了与股东的利益保持一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人员可能是创立业务的。您可以点击此处查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Porch Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有20%股权的一般公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对Porch Group有一定的影响力。虽然这一所有权规模可能不足以影响他们对一项政策决策的支持,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Porch Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Porch Group has 4 warning signs (and 2 which don't sit too well with us) we think you should know about.
考虑到在公司股份中拥股的不同群体总是值得的。但为了更好地理解Porch Group,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例 - Porch Group有4个警示信号(还有2个让我们不太满意的信号),我们认为您应该了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。