share_log

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:2145) Stock Price Dropped 5.6% Last Week; Employee Share Scheme Would Not Be Happy

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:2145) Stock Price Dropped 5.6% Last Week; Employee Share Scheme Would Not Be Happy

上海上美股份化妆品有限公司(HKG:2145)的股价上周下跌了5.6%;员工分红计划可能不会让人开心
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/05 07:24

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic's significant employee share scheme ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 83% ownership
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 上海上美股份的员工股权计划持有量显著,表明关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响。
  • 共有2名投资者在公司中拥有83%的控股权。
  • 内部人士最近购买了股票。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (HKG:2145), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are employee share scheme with 42% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制着上海上美股份有限公司(HKG:2145),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有最大份额的是员工股权计划,拥有42%的股份。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

While insiders, who own 40% shares weren't spared from last week's HK$776m market cap drop, employee share scheme as a group suffered the maximum losses

虽然内部人士持有40%的股份,但他们也未能幸免于上周760亿港元市值的下跌,员工持股计划作为一个整体遭受了最大的损失

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于上海上美股份化妆品的哪些信息。

big
SEHK:2145 Ownership Breakdown November 4th 2024
香港交易所:2145 持股结构 2024年11月4日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic?

缺乏机构持股对我们了解上海上美股份化妆品有什么启示?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构不拥有股票的原因有多种解释。最常见的是公司相对于管理基金过小,因此机构不必仔细审查公司。也有可能是基金经理人不持有股票,因为他们不确信该股票表现良好。机构投资者可能并不认为该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的过去营业收入表现。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司可能没有任何机构出现在股份登记簿上有很多原因。如果流动性(每天交易的股份数量)低,机构可能很难买入大量股份。如果公司没有需要筹集资本,机构可能没有机会建立头寸。另一方面,专业投资者可能会因为不认为这是一笔好投资而避免投资这家公司。上海上美股份化妆品的盈利和营业收入记录(见下)可能对机构投资者没有吸引力——或者他们根本没有仔细查看过这项业务。

big
SEHK:2145 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 4th 2024
SEHK:2145 盈利和营业收入增长 2024年11月4日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic. Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd, ESOP is currently the largest shareholder, with 42% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 40% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Note that the second and third-largest shareholders are also Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, meaning that the company's top shareholders are insiders.

对冲基金在上海上美股份的持股并不多。 上海上美股份有限公司,员工持股计划目前是最大的股东,持有42%的流通股。 作为背景,第二大股东持有大约40%的流通股,第三大股东持有0.2%。 请注意,第二大和第三大股东分别是首席执行官和董事会成员,意味着公司的主要股东是内部人员。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic

上海上美股份的内部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd.. Insiders own HK$5.3b worth of shares in the HK$13b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看来内部人士持有上海上美股份化妆品有限公司相当大比例的股份。内部人士在这家市值130亿港元的公司中持有价值53亿港元的股份。这非常有意义。大多数人会说这显示了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在这样规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有上海上美股份化妆品17%的股份。这样的持股规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不同,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic .

我发现查看到底是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意我们在上海上美股份化妆品上发现的1个警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发