share_log

Recent 4.9% Pullback Would Hurt Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) Insiders

Recent 4.9% Pullback Would Hurt Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) Insiders

最近的4.9%回撤会对史丹利农业集团股份有限公司(SZSE:002588)内部人员造成损失
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/05 07:34

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 对斯坦利农业集团有限公司的重大内部控制意味着公司增长中的既得利益
  • 前五名股东拥有公司51%的股份
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

Every investor in Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 58% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

斯坦利农业集团公司的每位投资者,Ltd.(深圳证券交易所:002588)应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有58%所有权的个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥426m.

结果,在市值下跌42600万元人民币之后,内部人士整体遭受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关斯坦利农业集团有限公司的哪些信息。

big
SZSE:002588 Ownership Breakdown November 4th 2024
SZSE: 002588 所有权明细 2024 年 11 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd?

关于斯坦利农业集团有限公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

斯坦利农业集团有限公司已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看斯坦利农业集团有限公司过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
SZSE:002588 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 4th 2024
SZSE: 002588 2024 年 11 月 4 日收益和收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Wen Ban Gao, with ownership of 23%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 4.6% of the stock. Jin Hua Gao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对斯坦利农业集团有限公司进行有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是高文彬,所有权为23%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约15%和4.6%的股份。第二大股东高金华也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即该公司约有51%的股份由前五名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd

斯坦利农业集团有限公司的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥4.8b stake in this CN¥8.3b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.

我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有斯坦利农业集团公司一半以上的股份。,有限公司。这使他们能够有效控制公司。这意味着内部人士在这项83元人民币的业务中拥有非常有价值的48元人民币的股份。大多数人会认为这是积极的,显示出与股东的强烈一致性。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在出售股份。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司34%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了斯坦利农业集团有限公司的两个警告标志(其中一个不太适合我们!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发