share_log

Is Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) Using Too Much Debt?

Nordson (纳斯达克:NDSN)是否使用了过多的债务?
Simply Wall St ·  11/05 18:21

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ:NDSN) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

有人说,作为投资者,最好的风险思考方式是波动性,而不是债务,但沃伦•巴菲特曾经说过,'波动性与风险远非同义词。' 当您评估一个公司的风险时,自然会考虑到其资产负债表,因为债务在企业倒闭时往往是涉及的。与许多其他公司一样,Nordson公司(纳斯达克:NDSN)使用债务。但股东们是否应该担心其使用债务呢?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般来说,只有当一家公司无法轻松偿还债务时,债务才会成为真正的问题,无论是通过筹集资本还是通过自身现金流。如果情况变得非常糟糕,债权人就可以接管企业。尽管这种情况并不常见,但我们经常看到负债的公司因债权人迫使其以低价筹集资本而导致股东永久稀释。当然,许多公司使用债务来资助增长,没有任何负面后果。在考虑一家公司的债务使用时,我们首先看现金和债务两者。

How Much Debt Does Nordson Carry?

纳斯达克公司 Nordson 承载了多少债务?

As you can see below, at the end of July 2024, Nordson had US$1.49b of debt, up from US$838.1m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$165.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$1.33b.

正如下文所示,在2024年7月底,Nordson的债务达到了14.9亿美元,比一年前的83810万美元有所增加。点击图像以获取更多详细信息。然而,由于其拥有16530万美元的现金储备,其净债务较少,约为13.3亿美元。

big
NasdaqGS:NDSN Debt to Equity History November 5th 2024
纳斯达克公司 Nordson 债务股本比历史数据2024年11月5日

A Look At Nordson's Liabilities

观察nordson的负债情况

The latest balance sheet data shows that Nordson had liabilities of US$518.3m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.83b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$165.3m in cash and US$538.5m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.65b.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,nordson有51830万美元的一年内到期的负债,以及18.3亿美元的到期后的负债。 抵消这一点,它有16530万美元的现金和53850万美元的应收账款,在12个月内到期。 因此,它的负债超过了其现金和(短期)应收账款的总和16.5亿美元。

Of course, Nordson has a titanic market capitalization of US$14.2b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

当然,nordson具有142亿美元的巨大市值,因此这些负债可能是可以管理的。 话虽如此,显然我们应继续监控其资产负债表,以防情况变得更糟。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过将公司的净债务与其息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)相除,并计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何覆盖其利息费用(利息覆盖率)来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力。因此,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。

With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.6, Nordson uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 8.3 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. On the other hand, Nordson saw its EBIT drop by 3.7% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Nordson can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

拥有1.6的债务与EBITDA比率,nordson以巧妙但负责任的方式使用债务。 其过去12个月的EBIt是其利息支出的8.3倍,这与该主题一致。 另一方面,nordson在过去12个月中,其EBIt下降了3.7%。 如果收入继续以这个速度下降,公司可能会越来越难以管理其债务负担。 毫无疑问,我们通过资产负债表最能了解债务情况。 但最终,业务未来的盈利能力将决定nordson是否能随时间加强其资产负债表。 因此,如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现对分析师盈利预测的免费报告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Nordson recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 82% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

但我们最终的考虑也很重要,因为一家公司无法用纸面利润支付债务; 它需要现金。 因此,我们总是检查多少EBIt转化为自由现金流。 在过去三年中,nordson录得的自由现金流价值达到了其EBIt的足有82%,这比我们通常预期的要强。 这使其有能力偿还债务,如果需要的话。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Nordson's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that Nordson takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example - Nordson has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

高兴的是,nordson将EBIt转化为自由现金流的出色表现意味着它在债务方面占据上风。但是,更加严肃的是,我们对其EBIt增长率有些担忧。综合考虑所有这些数据,我们认为nordson在处理债务方面采取了相当明智的方式。虽然这带来一些风险,但也能增加股东的回报。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个开始的好地方。但最终,每家公司都可能存在在资产负债表之外的风险。例如 - nordson有1个警示标志,我们认为您应该注意。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有这些之后,您更感兴趣的是具有坚实资产负债表的快速增长公司,那么不要拖延,查看我们的净现金增长股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发