share_log

Investors Could Be Concerned With TriMas' (NASDAQ:TRS) Returns On Capital

Investors Could Be Concerned With TriMas' (NASDAQ:TRS) Returns On Capital

投资者可能会关注纳斯达克上的TriMas(TRS)资本回报率
Simply Wall St ·  11/05 18:56

Ignoring the stock price of a company, what are the underlying trends that tell us a business is past the growth phase? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. And from a first read, things don't look too good at TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS), so let's see why.

忽略一家公司的股价,有哪些潜在趋势可以告诉我们一家企业已经走出了增长阶段?一家潜在处于衰退中的企业通常会展现出两种趋势,一个是资本雇用回报率(ROCE)在下降,另一个是资本雇用基数也在下降。这样的趋势最终意味着企业正在减少投资,同时也在投资上获得的利润更少。从初步阅读来看,TriMas(纳斯达克代码:TRS)的情况并不乐观,让我们看看为什么。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我们对 Enphase Energy 的资本雇用回报率的看法:正如我们上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的资本回报率没有提高,但它正在重新投资于业务。投资者必须认为未来会有更好的前景,因为股票表现良好,使持股五年以上的股东获得了 690% 的收益。最终,如果基本趋势持续存在,我们不会对它成为一只多头股持有期很久很有信心。

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for TriMas:

对于那些不确定ROCE是什么的人,它衡量公司从其业务中的资本雇用中可以产生多少税前利润。分析师使用这个公式来计算TriMas的ROCE:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)

0.051 = US$62m ÷ (US$1.4b - US$154m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

0.051 = 6200万美元 ÷ (14亿美元 - 1.54亿美元)(基于截至2024年9月的过去十二个月)。

Thus, TriMas has an ROCE of 5.1%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Packaging industry average of 8.8%.

因此,TriMas的ROCE为5.1%。最终,这是一个较低的回报率,并且低于包装行业平均水平8.8%。

big
NasdaqGS:TRS Return on Capital Employed November 5th 2024
NasdaqGS:TRS资本雇用回报率2024年11月5日

In the above chart we have measured TriMas' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for TriMas .

在上面的图表中,我们已经测量了TriMas在之前的资本回报率与其之前的表现进行了对比,但未来可能更为重要。如果您想了解分析师对未来的预测,您应该查看我们为TriMas提供的免费分析师报告。

What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us

尽管如此,当我们看 enphase energy (纳斯达克股票代码:ENPH) 的时候,它似乎并没有完全符合这些要求。

There is reason to be cautious about TriMas, given the returns are trending downwards. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 7.8% that they were earning five years ago. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on TriMas becoming one if things continue as they have.

对于TriMas有理由持谨慎态度,因为回报率呈下降趋势。遗憾的是,资本回报率已经从五年前的7.8%下降,而资本运用方面,该企业使用的资本大致与那时相同。展现这些特征的公司往往不会缩小规模,但可能已经成熟,而且正面临来自竞争的利润压力。因此,由于这些趋势通常不利于创造超高回报,如果事情继续下去,我们不太看好TriMas会成为这样一家企业。

The Bottom Line On TriMas' ROCE

TriMas的资本回报率结论

In summary, it's unfortunate that TriMas is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 19% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere.

总而言之,不幸的是TriMas从同等资本中获得更低的回报。因此,过去五年来股价下跌了19%,因此投资者似乎已经意识到这些变化。考虑到这些方面的不利趋势,我们可能要考虑寻找其他投资机会。

TriMas does have some risks, we noticed 3 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

TriMas确实存在一些风险,我们注意到有3个警示信号(还有一个有点令人担忧),我们认为您应该知道。

While TriMas isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

虽然TriMas的回报率不是最高的,请查看这份免费名单,其中列出了具有稳健资产负债表并获得高股本回报率的公司。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发