share_log

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE:THG) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 88% of the Company

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE:THG) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 88% of the Company

汉诺威保险集团股份有限公司(纽交所:THG)受到持有公司88%股份的机构投资者青睐
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/05 19:17

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Hanover Insurance Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构持有情况显著高,这意味着汉诺威保险集团的股票价格对他们的交易行为非常敏感
  • 共有13位投资者持有该公司51%的所有权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

Every investor in The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE:THG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 88% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (纽交所:THG)的投资者都应该了解最大股东群体。我们可以看到,机构持有该公司88%的股份。换句话说,该集团收益(或亏损)最大的可能性来自他们对该公司的投资。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hanover Insurance Group.

让我们近距离观察不同类型的股东,看看它们能为我们提供汉诺威保险集团的什么信息。

big
NYSE:THG Ownership Breakdown November 5th 2024
纽交所:THG所有权拆分2024年11月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hanover Insurance Group?

机构所有权告诉我们有关汉诺威保险集团的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Hanover Insurance Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hanover Insurance Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

汉诺威保险集团已经有机构在股东名册上。事实上,他们拥有公司中令人尊重的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像任何其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售某支股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查汉诺威保险集团的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:THG Earnings and Revenue Growth November 5th 2024
纽交所:THG2024年11月5日收益和营业收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hanover Insurance Group. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.3% and 6.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会很可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到,对汉诺威保险集团,对冲基金没有实质性投资。 同时,凡尔赛集团目前是最大的股东,持有已发行股份的9.9%。 与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的9.3%和6.8%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据的进一步研究表明,前13大股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Hanover Insurance Group

汉诺威保险集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$50m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己的名义持有汉诺威保险集团股份不到1%。这是一家相当大的公司,董事会成员可能拥有公司中的重要利益,尽管持有比例不高。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约5000万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但值得检查这些内部人是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Hanover Insurance Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有汉诺威保险集团的11%股份。虽然这个群体不能称霸,但它确实可以对公司的运营产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hanover Insurance Group better, we need to consider many other factors.

考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解汉诺威保险集团,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发