Individual Investors Are Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300925) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.3b
Individual Investors Are Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300925) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.3b
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- 30% of Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd is held by insiders
- 深圳法本信息技术有限公司由个人投资者持有相当比例的股份,这表明他们在管理和业务策略上共同拥有更大的发言权。
- 前16名股东持有该业务50%的股份。
- 深圳法本信息技术有限公司30%的股份由内部人士持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300925), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制着深圳法本信息技术有限公司(SZSE:300925)很重要,需要了解该企业的所有权结构。持有最大比例的是个人投资者,拥有47%的所有权。换句话说,这个群体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最多)。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 10% price drop, insiders with their 30% also suffered.
上周股价下跌10%后,个人投资者的持股受到了打击,持股30%的内部人员也遭受了损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了深圳法本信息技术有限公司的不同所有权集团。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd?
机构所有权对我们如何看待深圳法本信息技术有限公司提供了哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
深圳法本信息技术有限公司的股东名册上已经有了一些机构。实际上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉度。然而,最好对依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证持谨慎态度。他们也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变对股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,查看深圳法本信息技术有限公司的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Hua Yan with 25% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.0% and 2.5% of the stock.
对冲基金在深圳法本信息科技有限公司持有的股票不多。从我们的数据中可以看出,最大的股东是CEO华岩,持有25%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约6.0%和2.5%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
通过股东登记簿我们可以看到,16个最大的股东控制着50%的所有权,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
尽管我们需要研究一个公司的机构所有权数据是有道理的,但也需要研究分析师的情绪来了解市场趋势。我们目前没有发现任何关于该股票的分析师报道,所以该公司可能不受广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd
深圳法本信息技术有限公司的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥3.3b worth of shares in the CN¥11b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
内部股东拥有深圳法本信息科技有限公司的相当大比例。内部人士拥有价值33亿人民币的股份,占该110亿人民币公司的相当大比例。这相当有意义。看到这种程度的投资是件好事。您可以在这里检查,看看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 47% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众拥有47%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成,对深圳法本信息科技有限公司有一定程度的影响力。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 13%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们可以看到私人公司拥有发行股票的13%。这值得更深入地研究。如果关联方,例如内部人员,对其中一家私人公司有兴趣,那么应该在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对该公司有战略兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有更重要的因素。例如,我们发现了深圳法本信息技术有限公司的2个警示标志(1个有点令人担忧!)在您在此处投资之前,您应该了解这些。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。