Arrow Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:AROW) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 14% Over Last Week
Arrow Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:AROW) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 14% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Arrow Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 显著较高的机构持股意味着箭牌金融的股价对它们的交易行为非常敏感
- 前 25 名股东拥有该公司的 46%。
- 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。
If you want to know who really controls Arrow Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:AROW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着Arrow Financial Corporation (纳斯达克:AROW),那么您需要查看其股东登记表的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的绝大部分股份,持股比例为49%。也就是说,如果股价上涨(或者出现下跌),这一群体将获得最大利益(或者损失最大)。
Last week's 14% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 50% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上周的14%增长意味着机构投资者处于正面,即使公司展现出强劲的长期趋势。 股东的一年回报目前为50%,上周的增长是锦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Arrow Financial, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究箭牌金融的每一种所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arrow Financial?
机构持股告诉我们有关箭牌金融的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Arrow Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Arrow Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到箭牌金融确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。 但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为有时机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。 如果多个机构同时改变他们对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的箭牌金融的盈利历史。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Arrow Financial is not owned by hedge funds. North Country Investment Advisers, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.
箭牌金融未被对冲基金拥有。 北国投资顾问公司目前是最大的股东,持有12%的流通股。 黑石集团拥有的普通股7.7%,范迪公司持有约5%的公司股票。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Arrow Financial
箭牌金融的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Arrow Financial Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$13m worth of the US$492m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
最新数据显示,公司内部股东拥有 Arrow 金融公司的部分股份。作为个人,这些内部人士共同拥有价值1300万美元的49200万美元公司。看到内部人士有一些投资是好事,但值得检查这些内部人士是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in Arrow Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,在 Arrow 金融公司持有48%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能左右局面,但肯定能对公司的运行产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史记录,你也可以免费访问这个详细图表中的历史营收和收益图表。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。