With 73% Ownership in First Merchants Corporation (NASDAQ:FRME), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 73% Ownership in First Merchants Corporation (NASDAQ:FRME), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in First Merchants implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 机构在第一招商股份持有大量股份,这意味着他们对公司的股价具有重要影响力
- 共有17家投资者持有该公司的大部分股权,占51%的所有权。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls First Merchants Corporation (NASDAQ:FRME), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 73% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果想了解谁实际控制第一招商股份公司(纳斯达克:FRME),那么您就需要查看其股东登记册的构成。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有绝大部分股份,占有73%。也就是说,如果股价上涨(或市场出现下行),这些机构将获益最多(或损失最多)
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 15% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 56% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
因此,上周公司股价上涨15%,机构投资者获得了最丰厚的回报。目前投资回报率为56%,上周的涨幅堪称喜人。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of First Merchants.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注第一招商股份的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Merchants?
机构持股告诉我们关于第一招商的什么信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that First Merchants does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see First Merchants' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到第一招商股份确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的很大比例。这说明为这些机构工作的分析师们已经研究过这支股票,而且他们很喜欢。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错。当多家机构持有一支股票时,总有一种风险,即他们处于“挤兑交易”中。当这种交易出错时,多方可能竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看第一招商股份的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事永远不只这些。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. First Merchants is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
机构投资者拥有超过公司50%的股份,因此他们可能共同对董事会决策产生强烈影响。 第一招商股份不被对冲基金所拥有。 我们的数据显示,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股东,持有11%的流通股份。 与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股份的8.2%和5.9%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
通过进一步的调查,我们发现前17名股东在公司中的持有总比例为51%,表明没有单一的股东对公司有重要控制力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of First Merchants
第一招商的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in First Merchants Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$34m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股东可能会对此感兴趣,其中内部人士持有第一招商股份。 内部人士持有价值3400万美元的股份。 大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。 看到内部人士有这种投资水平是件好事。 您可以在这里检查看看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over First Merchants. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
拥有25%股权的普通公众,主要是个人投资者,对第一招商股份有一定程度的影响力。 尽管这种所有权相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东意见不同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for First Merchants that you should be aware of before investing here.
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同团体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们发现了第一招商股份的1个警告信号,您在投资之前应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。