MSA Safety (NYSE:MSA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
MSA Safety (NYSE:MSA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
传奇基金经理李录(得到查理·芒格支持)曾经说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格波动,而是你是否会遭受永久性的资本损失。” 因此,当你考虑任何特定股票的风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会拖垮一家公司。 我们注意到msa safety公司(纽交所: msa)的资产负债表上确实有债务。 但这笔债务是否会让股东担忧呢?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
当一家企业无法通过自由现金流或以有吸引力的价格筹集资金来轻松履行债务时,债务和其他负债就成为风险。 资本主义的一个重要特征是“创造性破坏”过程,即失败的企业会被银行无情清算。 虽然这种情况并不常见,但我们经常看到有债务的公司因为债权人强迫其以压力价格筹集资金而导致股东永久性摊薄。 当然,许多公司利用债务来实现增长,没有产生任何负面后果。 在考虑企业使用多少债务时,首要之处是将现金和债务一起看待。
What Is MSA Safety's Debt?
msa safety的债务是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that MSA Safety had US$554.7m of debt in September 2024, down from US$742.0m, one year before. However, it also had US$154.4m in cash, and so its net debt is US$400.4m.
您可以点击下面的图形查看历史数据,但显示msa safety在2024年9月有55470万美元的债务,低于之前一年的74200万美元。 然而,它也有15440万美元的现金,因此净债务为40040万美元。
A Look At MSA Safety's Liabilities
msa safety负债情况一览
According to the last reported balance sheet, MSA Safety had liabilities of US$314.5m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$832.1m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$154.4m in cash and US$277.3m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$714.9m.
根据最近披露的资产负债表,MSA Safety的负债中有31450万元美元在12个月内到期,而超过12个月到期的负债为83210万元美元。与此相抵,该公司的现金为15440万元美元,应收账款为27730万元美元,在12个月内到期。因此,其负债超过现金和(短期)应收账款的总和达到71490万元美元。
Since publicly traded MSA Safety shares are worth a total of US$6.60b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由于公开交易的 msa safety 股票总值为66亿美元,因此似乎不太可能这种水平的负债构成重大威胁。但有足够的负债,我们当然会建议股东继续密切关注资产负债表的变化。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我们通过将公司的净债务与其息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)相除,并计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何覆盖其利息费用(利息覆盖率)来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力。因此,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。
MSA Safety's net debt is only 0.84 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 13.4 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Fortunately, MSA Safety grew its EBIT by 7.6% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine MSA Safety's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
MSA Safety的净债务仅为其EBITDA的0.84倍。而其EBIT轻松覆盖其利息支出,是13.4倍之多。因此,我们对其超保守地使用债务感到放心。幸运的是,MSA Safety 在去年的EBIT上增长了7.6%,使得负债负担看起来更加可控。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但最终能否保持健康资产负债表更多地取决于未来的收入,这才是决定 MSA Safety 能否保持健康财务状况的关键。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, MSA Safety's free cash flow amounted to 34% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
但我们最终的考虑也很重要,因为公司无法用纸面利润偿付债务;它需要冷硬现金。因此,我们始终检查多少EBIT被转化为自由现金流。在过去三年中,MSA Safety 的自由现金流相当于其EBIT的34%,低于我们的预期。这种较弱的现金转化率使得处理债务更加困难。
Our View
我们的观点
Happily, MSA Safety's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that MSA Safety can handle its debt fairly comfortably. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. We'd be motivated to research the stock further if we found out that MSA Safety insiders have bought shares recently. If you would too, then you're in luck, since today we're sharing our list of reported insider transactions for free.
值得高兴的是,MSA Safety令人印象深刻的利息偿付能力意味着它在债务方面具有优势。但是,更令人担忧的是,我们对其将EBIt转化为自由现金流的情况有些担忧。 综合考虑所有上述因素,我们认为MSA Safety可以相当舒适地处理其债务。当然,虽然这种杠杆可以增加股本回报率,但也带来更多风险,因此值得关注。如果发现MSA Safety内部人士最近购买了股票,我们会更有动力进一步研究这只股票。如果你也是这样,那么你很幸运,因为今天我们将免费分享我们的报告的内部交易列表。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。