Institutional Investors Are Old Second Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OSBC) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$67m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Old Second Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OSBC) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$67m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Old Second Bancorp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 22 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 考虑到机构在股票中拥有的大量股权,Old Second Bancorp的股价可能会受到他们交易决定的影响
- 这家公司的前22大股东拥有其50%的股份。
- 最近有内部人员购买。
A look at the shareholders of Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:OSBC) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 66% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (纳斯达克: OSBC)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。持有最大股份的是拥有66%所有权的机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 8.8% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 35%.
结果,公司股价上周上涨8.8%,使机构投资者获得最丰厚的回报。 上周的收益将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前达到35%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Old Second Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解每种类型的old second bancorp所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Old Second Bancorp?
机构所有权告诉我们有关Old Second Bancorp的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Old Second Bancorp. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Old Second Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在old second bancorp拥有相当大比例的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅凭这一事实就依赖,因为机构有时也会犯错误的投资,就像每个人一样。 当多个机构持有某股票时,存在它们正在进行的'拥挤交易'的风险。 当这种交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。 这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。 您可以在下面查看old second bancorp的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更为复杂的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Old Second Bancorp. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.7% of shares outstanding. With 5.2% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and 1st & Main Growth Partners are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that James Eccher, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.
由于机构投资者拥有超过半数已发行股份,董事会可能会注意他们的偏好。我们注意到对old second bancorp来说,对冲基金没有实质性投资。截至目前,BlackRock,Inc. 是该公司最大的股东,持有7.7%的股份。分别持有5.2%和4.4%的已发行股份,The Vanguard Group,Inc.和1st & Main Growth Partners分别是第二和第三大股东。此外,我们发现首席执行官詹姆斯·埃切尔名下有0.7%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 22 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记表看,前22名股东控制着50%的股权,这意味着没有任何单一股东拥有绝对控股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Old Second Bancorp
old second bancorp内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Old Second Bancorp, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$27m worth of stock in the US$748m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
股东可能会感兴趣地知道内部人士在old second bancorp,inc.拥有股份。在其自身名下,内部人士拥有价值2700万美元的股票,在这家价值74800万美元的公司中拥有股份。看到内部人士有一些投资是件好事,但值得注意的是,这些内部人士有没有在买入股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司持有30%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽略。虽然拥有这种所有权的规模可能不足以使决策在他们的利益中而翻转,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Old Second Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Old Second Bancorp has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
始终值得考虑公司的不同股东群体。 但要更好地了解old second bancorp,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 以风险为例-old second bancorp有1个警告标志,我们认为您应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。