Capital City Bank Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCBG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCBG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Capital City Bank Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,首都银行集团的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
- 51% 的业务由前 12 名股东持有
- 业内人士最近一直在抛售
If you want to know who really controls Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:CCBG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制了首都银行集团有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CCBG),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为45%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$70m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 39%.
在上周该公司的市值上涨了7000万美元之后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。上周的涨势将进一步提振目前为39%的股东一年回报率。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Capital City Bank Group.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关首都银行集团的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Capital City Bank Group?
关于首都银行集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
Capital City Bank Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Capital City Bank Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
首都银行集团已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下首都银行集团过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Capital City Bank Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO William Smith with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 5.1% of the stock.
对冲基金在首都银行集团的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官威廉·史密斯,其已发行股票的17%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约11%和5.1%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前12名股东的合并所有权为51%,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Capital City Bank Group
首都银行集团的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Capital City Bank Group, Inc.. Insiders have a US$118m stake in this US$605m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息表明,内部人士持有Capital City Bank Group, Inc.的大量股份。业内人士在这笔6.05亿美元的业务中持有1.18亿美元的股份。很高兴看到内部人士对这项业务进行如此投资。可能值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in Capital City Bank Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有首都银行集团35%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Capital City Bank Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those can't be ignored...
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。请注意,首都银行集团在我们的投资分析中显示了两个警告信号,其中一个不容忽视...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。