Institutional Investors Are Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:GLRE) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$62m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:GLRE) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$62m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Greenlight Capital Re's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 考虑到机构在股票中所占的大部分股权,绿光资本再保公司的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 企业前11大股东持有其51%的股份。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLRE) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 46% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看绿光资本再保险有限公司(纳斯达克:GLRE)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。拥有最大股份的群体是拥有46%所有权的机构。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$508m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 43%.
上周,机构投资者受益最多,因为该公司的市值达到了50800万美元。 上周的收益将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前为43%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Greenlight Capital Re, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解绿光资本再保公司的每种所有者,首先从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greenlight Capital Re?
关于绿光资本再保公司的机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Greenlight Capital Re. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Greenlight Capital Re's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者持有绿光资本再保公司的相当大的股权。 这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定程度的信誉。 但最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。 有时,他们也会犯错。 如果多家机构同时改变他们对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看绿光资本再保公司下面的收益历史。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Greenlight Capital Re is not owned by hedge funds. Dme 2022 Holdings, Llc is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.0% and 5.8% of the stock.
绿光资本再保公司并不是由对冲基金拥有。Dme 2022 Holdings, Llc目前是该公司最大的股东,持有14%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约6.0%和5.8%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东注册表,我们可以看到前11大股东控制着该公司51%的股权,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有多数股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但同时调查分析师建议也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。我们目前没有发现任何关于该公司的分析师报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Greenlight Capital Re
绿光资本再保公司的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.. Insiders have a US$71m stake in this US$508m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根据我们最新的数据显示,内部持有人拥有绿光资本再保公司相当比例的股份。内部持有人在这家市值50800万美元的业务中持有7100万美元的股份。我们会说这显示了与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部持有人可能是创立了这家业务。您可以 单击此处 查看这些内部持有人是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通大众——包括零售投资者——拥有该公司的26%股份,因此不容易被忽视。虽然拥有规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东的决策不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据显示,私营公司拥有该公司14%的股份。深入了解一下可能是值得的。如果相关方,如内部人员,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Greenlight Capital Re that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同团体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经发现绿光资本再保公司存在1个警告信号,你应该注意。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。