With 41% Ownership in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:METC), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 41% Ownership in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:METC), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ramaco Resources' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- 10% of Ramaco Resources is held by insiders
- 鉴于机构在股票中持有大量股份,ramaco resources的股价可能会受到它们交易决策的影响
- 前6名股东持有公司51%的股份。
- ramaco resources的10%股份由内部人士持有
If you want to know who really controls Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:METC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解谁真正控制ramaco resources, inc. (纳斯达克:METC),那么您需要查看其股东名册的构成。持有公司股票数量最多的群体,准确地说约占41%的股份,是机构。换句话说,该群体将从他们对该公司的投资中获得最多(或者损失最多)
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$580m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 10% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周,机构投资者获益最多,公司市值达到了58000万美元。投资回报率为10%,上周的收益将更受欢迎。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ramaco Resources.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注Ramaco Resources的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ramaco Resources?
机构持股告诉我们关于Ramaco Resources的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ramaco Resources. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ramaco Resources' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Ramaco Resources中持有相当数量的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过这支股票,他们喜欢这支股票。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错。如果多个机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面Ramaco Resources的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Ramaco Resources is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Yorktown Partners LLC, with ownership of 30%. Randall Atkins is the second largest shareholder owning 6.0% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 4.9% of the company stock. Randall Atkins, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
Ramaco Resources不是机构所有。该公司最大的股东是Yorktown Partners LLC,持有30%的股份。Randall Atkins是第二大股东,拥有6.0%的普通股,BlackRock,Inc.持有约4.9%的公司股份。Randall Atkins,也是第二大股东,同时也担任首席执行官。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前6大股东持有超过一半的股份登记簿,有一些较小的股东来平衡较大股东的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Ramaco Resources
ramaco resources的内部股权所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Ramaco Resources, Inc.. Insiders have a US$59m stake in this US$580m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人士持有ramaco resources, inc.的相当比例。 内部人士在这家市值为58000万美元的企业中持有5900万美元的股份。看到内部人员如此投入业务真是太好了。也许值得检查一下这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司拥有19%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能决定大局,但它肯定会对公司的经营产生实际影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With a stake of 30%, private equity firms could influence the Ramaco Resources board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
持有30%股份的股权投资公司可能会影响ramaco resources董事会。有时,我们会看到私募股权投资公司以长期持有为主,但一般来说,它们的投资时间较短,正如名字所示,不会在公共公司中投资太多。一段时间后,它们可能会考虑出售并将资本重新配置到其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Ramaco Resources has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同团体是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例 - ramaco resources存在3个警示信号,我们认为你应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。