share_log

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Tong Ren Tang Technologies (HKG:1666) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Five Years

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Tong Ren Tang Technologies (HKG:1666) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Five Years

正面盈利增长还不足以使同仁堂科技(HKG:1666)股东在过去五年中获得良好的回报
Simply Wall St ·  11/07 18:17

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. So we wouldn't blame long term Tong Ren Tang Technologies Co. Ltd. (HKG:1666) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 25% over a half decade. But it's up 8.8% in the last week.

为了证明选择个股的努力是值得的,值得努力超越市场指数基金的回报。但即使是最好的股票选手也只能在某些选择上获胜。因此,我们不会责怪长期持有同仁堂科技股份有限公司(HKG:1666)的股东对他们的决定持怀疑态度,因为股价在过去半个十年下跌了25%。但在上周上涨了8.8%。

On a more encouraging note the company has added HK$576m to its market cap in just the last 7 days, so let's see if we can determine what's driven the five-year loss for shareholders.

更令人鼓舞的是,公司在过去7天内将5亿7600万港元增加到了其市值,让我们看看是否可以确定是什么导致了股东五年来的亏损。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

为了概述本杰明·格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham)的话:短期内,市场是一台投票机,但长期来看,它是一台衡重机。思考一家公司的市场感知如何转变的一种不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)变化与股价变动进行比较。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Tong Ren Tang Technologies actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 0.7% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.

在不幸的半个十年里,股价下跌的同时,同仁堂科技实际上看到每股收益(EPS)每年提高了0.7%。考虑到股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑EPS在这段时间内并不是业务表现的良好指标(可能是由于一次性损失或收益)。或者,市场之前非常乐观,所以股票尽管EPS有所改善,仍然令人失望。

By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, five years ago. Having said that, we might get a better idea of what's going on with the stock by looking at other metrics.

通过瞥一眼这些数字,我们认为,五年前市场对较高增长有很高的期望。话虽如此,通过观察其他指标,我们可能会更好地了解股票的情况。

In contrast to the share price, revenue has actually increased by 11% a year in the five year period. So it seems one might have to take closer look at the fundamentals to understand why the share price languishes. After all, there may be an opportunity.

与股价相反,营业收入在五年期内实际上每年增长11%。因此,似乎必须更加仔细地审视基本面,以了解为何股价停滞不前。毕竟,这可能是一个机会。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下面的图表显示了收益和营收随时间的变化情况(通过单击图像揭示确切的值)。

big
SEHK:1666 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 7th 2024
SEHK:1666于2024年11月7日的收益和营业收入增长

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Tong Ren Tang Technologies will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

值得注意的是CEO的薪酬低于类似规模公司的中位数。然而,CEO的薪酬总是值得检查的,真正重要的问题是公司未来是否能增长收益。因此,查看分析师认为同仁堂科技未来将赚取多少利润(免费利润预测)是很有意义的。

What About Dividends?

关于分红派息的问题

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Tong Ren Tang Technologies' TSR for the last 5 years was -13%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

考虑任何给定股票的总股东回报以及股价回报是很重要的。TSR包括任何分拆或折价增资的价值,以及基于股息被再投资的假设,任何分红。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司,TSR通常比股价回报高得多。同样,同仁堂科技过去5年的TSR为-13%,超过了前面提到的股价回报。毫无意外地,分红支付在很大程度上解释了这种偏差!

A Different Perspective

另一种看法

While the broader market gained around 22% in the last year, Tong Ren Tang Technologies shareholders lost 5.7% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 2% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Tong Ren Tang Technologies (of which 2 are a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.

尽管整体市场在过去一年中上涨了大约22%,同仁堂科技的股东们却亏损了5.7%(即使包括分红)。即使好股票的股价有时会下跌,但在我们对业务的基本指标看到改善之前,我们不会对其产生太多兴趣。不幸的是,去年的表现可能表明存在未解决的挑战,因为比过去半个世纪年化亏损2%的表现还要糟糕。我们知道罗斯柴尔德勋爵曾说过,投资者应该在“街上有血的时候买入”,但我们警告说,投资者应该首先确保自己在购买一家高质量的企业。考虑市场条件对股价的不同影响是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。比如风险。每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现了同仁堂科技的3个警示信号(其中有2个有点不太令人愉快!)你应该知道。

We will like Tong Ren Tang Technologies better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying.

如果我们看到一些大规模内部人员买入,我们将更喜欢同仁堂科技。在等待的时候,请查看这份免费的被低估股票名单(主要是小盘股),其中包括相当多的最近内部人员买入。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

请注意,本文引述的市场回报率反映了目前在香港交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报率。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发