Why WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG) Looks Like A Quality Company
Why WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG) Looks Like A Quality Company
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG).
许多投资者仍在学习分析股票时可能有用的各种指标。本文适用于那些想了解股本回报率(ROE)的人。为了使课程以实用为基础,我们将使用投资回报率来更好地了解Wk Kellogg Co(纽约证券交易所代码:KLG)。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
投资回报率或股本回报率是评估公司如何有效地从股东那里获得投资回报的有用工具。简而言之,它衡量公司相对于股东权益的盈利能力。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
你如何计算股本回报率?
The formula for return on equity is:
股本回报率的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回报率 = 净利润(来自持续经营)÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for WK Kellogg Co is:
因此,根据上述公式,Wk Kellogg Co的投资回报率为:
36% = US$121m ÷ US$336m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
36% = 1.21亿美元 ÷ 3.36亿美元(基于截至2024年6月的过去十二个月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.36 in profit.
“回报” 是过去十二个月的税后收入。对此进行概念化的一种方法是,该公司每拥有1美元的股东资本,就能获得0.36美元的利润。
Does WK Kellogg Co Have A Good ROE?
Wk Kellogg Co 的投资回报率不错吗?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. Pleasingly, WK Kellogg Co has a superior ROE than the average (14%) in the Food industry.
确定公司股本回报率是否不错的一种简单方法是将其与该行业的平均水平进行比较。重要的是,这远非一个完美的衡量标准,因为各公司在相同的行业分类中差异很大。令人高兴的是,Wk Kellogg Co的投资回报率高于食品行业的平均水平(14%)。
That is a good sign. With that said, a high ROE doesn't always indicate high profitability. Aside from changes in net income, a high ROE can also be the outcome of high debt relative to equity, which indicates risk. Our risks dashboardshould have the 3 risks we have identified for WK Kellogg Co.
这是一个好兆头。话虽如此,高投资回报率并不总是表示高盈利能力。除了净收入的变化外,较高的投资回报率也可能是高债务相对于股本的结果,这表明存在风险。我们的风险仪表板应该包含我们为Wk Kellogg Co确定的三种风险。
How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?
债务如何影响股本回报率?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
几乎所有公司都需要资金来投资业务,增加利润。这些现金可以来自发行股票、留存收益或债务。对于第一和第二种选择,投资回报率将反映现金用于增长的这种用途。在后一种情况下,用于增长的债务将提高回报,但不会影响总资产。这将使投资回报率看起来比不使用债务时更好。
WK Kellogg Co's Debt And Its 36% ROE
Wk Kellogg Co 的债务及其 36% 的投资回报率
It's worth noting the high use of debt by WK Kellogg Co, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.46. There's no doubt the ROE is impressive, but it's worth keeping in mind that the metric could have been lower if the company were to reduce its debt. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
值得注意的是,Wk Kellogg Co大量使用债务,导致其负债权益比率为1.46。毫无疑问,投资回报率令人印象深刻,但值得记住的是,如果该公司减少债务,该指标可能会更低。债务会增加风险,减少公司未来的选择,因此您通常希望从使用债务中获得丰厚的回报。
Conclusion
结论
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. All else being equal, a higher ROE is better.
股本回报率是我们可以比较不同公司的业务质量的一种方式。能够在不负债过多的情况下获得高股本回报的公司通常质量很好。在其他条件相同的情况下,更高的投资回报率更好。
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
话虽如此,尽管投资回报率是衡量业务质量的有用指标,但您必须考虑一系列因素才能确定购买股票的正确价格。相对于当前价格所反映的利润增长预期,还必须考虑利润可能的增长速度。因此,我认为可能值得查看这份关于分析师对公司的预测的免费报告。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你更愿意去另一家公司——一家财务状况可能优越的公司——那么千万不要错过这份免费的股本回报率高、债务低的有趣公司的名单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。