Kingboard Holdings Limited's (HKG:148) Market Cap Touched HK$22b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 44% as Well as Institutions
Kingboard Holdings Limited's (HKG:148) Market Cap Touched HK$22b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 44% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
主要见解
- Kingboard Holdings' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 2 shareholders own 60% of the company
- Insiders have been buying lately
- Kingboard Holdings的重要私人公司所有权表明,关键决策受到更大众股股东的影响
- 前2大股东拥有公司的60%。
- 内部人员最近一直在买入。
If you want to know who really controls Kingboard Holdings Limited (HKG:148), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着金伯利控股有限公司(HKG:148),那么你就需要看看其股东名册的构成。我们可以看到私人公司拥有该公司44%的所有权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最大(或者如果出现下滑,则损失最大)。
Following a 3.4% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but institutions who own 28% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上周股价上涨3.4%,私人公司获得了最大利润,但拥有28%股份的机构也从增长中获益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Kingboard Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解金伯利控股的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kingboard Holdings?
机构持股告诉我们金伯利控股的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kingboard Holdings. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Kingboard Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所见,机构投资者在金伯利控股中拥有相当多的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好还是警惕依赖所谓的机构投资者带来的认可。他们有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对某支股票的看法,您可能会看到股价急剧下跌。因此,值得看一下下面的金伯利控股盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Kingboard Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Hallgain Management Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 44% of shares outstanding. With 17% and 2.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, FMR LLC and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Wing Yiu Chang, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.
金伯利控股不是对冲基金所有。Hallgain Management Limited目前是最大的股东,持有44%的流通股。FMR LLC和The Vanguard Group, Inc.分别持有17%和2.6%的流通股,是第二和第三大股东。此外,我们发现CEO吴荣耀拥有0.9%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.
股东登记簿的更详细研究表明,前两名股东的持股量通过其60%的股份在公司中占比较大。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。研究分析师的看法也可以达到同样的效果。股票的分析师覆盖率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空间来增加其覆盖范围。
Insider Ownership Of Kingboard Holdings
金伯利控股的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Kingboard Holdings Limited. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own HK$518m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以看到内部人员在金板控股有股份。这是一家大公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性是很好的。内部人员持有51800万港元的股份(按目前的价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。不过,值得检查一下这些内部人员是否一直在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公众(包括散户投资者)拥有该公司25%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管该组可能不能发号施令,但确实可以对公司的运营产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到私人公司持有的已发行股份为44%。很难仅从这个事实中得出任何结论,因此了解谁拥有这些私人公司也很值得。有时内部人员或其他关联方通过一个独立的私人公司拥有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Kingboard Holdings (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .
我发现查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该了解我们发现的金伯利控股存在的2个警示信号(其中1个让我们有点不舒服)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。