share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SpartanNash Company's (NASDAQ:SPTN) Latest 11% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SpartanNash Company's (NASDAQ:SPTN) Latest 11% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

机构投资者可能在斯巴达纳什公司(纳斯达克:SPTN)最新的11%下跌加剧了全年亏损之后采取严厉措施
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/09 20:39

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, SpartanNash's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 考虑到机构在股票中所占比例较大,spartannash的股价可能会受到它们交易决策的影响。
  • 共有9个投资者持有该公司的51%所有权
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

Every investor in SpartanNash Company (NASDAQ:SPTN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

纳斯达克上的SpartanNash公司(NASDAQ:SPTN)的每位投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东团体。持有最大股份的是拥有84%所有权的机构,换句话说,这个机构面临着最大的上行潜力(或者下行风险)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 11% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 9.9% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in SpartanNash's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

机构投资者上周看到其持有的价值下跌了11%。不用说,最近的损失进一步增加了股东一年的损失,达到了9.9%,这可能不会得到机构股东尤其是这类股东的好评。也被称为 "智慧资金",机构对股价的走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果spartannash的股价继续疲弱,机构投资者可能会感到有必要出售该股票,这对个人投资者来说可能不是理想的情况。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SpartanNash.

让我们更近一步了解不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关spartannash的什么信息。

big
NasdaqGS:SPTN Ownership Breakdown November 9th 2024
纳斯达克:SPTN所有权拆分2024年11月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SpartanNash?

机构持股情况告诉我们有关spartannash的什么信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

SpartanNash already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SpartanNash, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

spartannash的股东注册表上已经有机构。事实上,他们在公司拥有一部分可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一些可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某一股票,那么很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查spartannash过去的收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:SPTN Earnings and Revenue Growth November 9th 2024
纳斯达克GS:spartannash盈利和营业收入增长2024年11月9日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in SpartanNash. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.4% and 7.7% of the stock.

投资者应该注意,实际上有一半以上的股份是由机构持有的,因此它们可以集体施加重大影响力。对于SpartanNash,对冲基金并没有太多股份。我们的数据显示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股东,持有17%的流通股。相较之下,第二和第三大股东持有的股份约为9.4%和7.7%。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了进一步的挖掘,并发现前9大股东持有该公司股份的51%左右,这意味着除了大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of SpartanNash

spartannash的内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can report that insiders do own shares in SpartanNash Company. In their own names, insiders own US$11m worth of stock in the US$667m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以报告说,spartannash公司的内部人员拥有股份。在他们自己的名字下,内部人员在这家总市值为66700万美元的公司中拥有价值1100万美元的股票。看到一些内部人员的投资是好事,但也值得看看这些内部人员是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的一般公众持有该公司的15%股份,因此无法轻易忽视。尽管拥有这样的所有权,但如果不与其他大股东保持同步,这种所有权规模可能还不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for SpartanNash (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。比如风险。每家公司都有这些风险,我们已经发现了spartannash的3个警示信号(其中1个有点不太好!)你应该了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发