Institutional Investors Are Community Financial System, Inc.'s (NYSE:CBU) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$416m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Community Financial System, Inc.'s (NYSE:CBU) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$416m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Community Financial System implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 机构在Community Financial System的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重要影响
- 前8大股东拥有公司50%的股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在买入。
If you want to know who really controls Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 72% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着Community Financial System, Inc. (纽交所: CBU),那么你需要看看它的股权登记情况。持有最大股份的是拥有72%所有权的机构群体。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$416m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 74% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周该公司的市值增加了4,1600万美元,机构投资者的情况正在好转。投资回报率为1年74%,上周的增长是受欢迎的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Community Financial System, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解Community Financial System的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Community Financial System?
机构持有的股份告诉我们有关Community Financial System的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Community Financial System does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Community Financial System, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到Community Financial System确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的一大部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两家大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此值得检查Community Financial System的过去收入轨迹(下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Community Financial System is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 14%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.9% of the stock.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会决策。Community Financial System并不属于对冲基金。该公司最大的股东是BlackRock,持有14%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约12%和6.9%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们对Brookfield Infrastructure有了更深入的了解,发现前8位股东占持股比例的约50%,这意味着除了大股东外还有少数小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Community Financial System
社区金融系统的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can see that insiders own shares in Community Financial System, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$44m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以看到,内部人员拥有Community Financial System, Inc.的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些可能具有意义的一致性通常是一个积极的信号。在这种情况下,他们持有约4400万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内部人员的一致性问题,可以单击此处查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公众,包括散户投资人,拥有该公司27%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然该群体不能决定公司的政策,但它确实可以对公司的经营产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。