Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.'s (NYSE:BNED) Market Cap Surged US$94m Last Week, Public Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.'s (NYSE:BNED) Market Cap Surged US$94m Last Week, Public Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Barnes & Noble Education indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 56% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 公共公司在Barnes & Noble Education中的重要持股表明,他们共同在管理和业务战略方面有更大的发言权
- 前三大股东持有该业务的56%股份。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (NYSE:BNED) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 42% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (NYSE:BNED)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。 公共公司拥有42%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群体。 也就是说,如果股票上涨,他们将获得最大利益(或者如果市场出现下滑,将承担最大损失)。
As a result, public companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 39% gain.
因此,上市公司成为上周39%涨幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Barnes & Noble Education.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Barnes&Noble Education的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Barnes & Noble Education?
机构持有情况告诉我们有关Barnes&Noble Education的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Barnes & Noble Education does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Barnes & Noble Education, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到Barnes&Noble Education确实有机构投资者; 他们持有公司股票的相当大比例。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉度。 但是我们不能仅凭这个事实而依赖,因为机构有时会犯错误投资,就像每个人都会一样。 如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图出售股票,那么看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。 因此,值得检查Barnes&Noble Education的过去盈利轨迹(下文)。 当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
It would appear that 7.9% of Barnes & Noble Education shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Immersion Corporation, with ownership of 42%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 6.0% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Jonathan Shar directly holds 1.4% of the total shares outstanding.
巴诺斯与贵族教育股份的7.9%由对冲基金控制。这一点值得注意,因为对冲基金往往是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内创造价值(以及更高的股价)。该公司最大的股东是沉浸公司,持有42%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约7.9%和6.0%的股份。此外,该公司的首席执行官乔纳森·莎尔直接持有总股本的1.4%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。分析师观点也可以达到相同的目的。我们的信息表明,这只股票没有任何分析师覆盖,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of Barnes & Noble Education
Barnes & Noble Education的内部人士持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$11m worth of stock in the US$331m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以报告,在Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.内部人员拥有股份。在他们自己的名义下,内部人员在这家价值33100万美元的公司中拥有1100万美元的股票。有人会说这显示了股东和董事会利益的一致性。但也值得检查一下这些内部人员是否一直在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in Barnes & Noble Education. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在Barnes & Noble Education持有38%的股份。尽管这个群体不能直接决定事务,但确实可以对公司的运行产生真正的影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 42% of the Barnes & Noble Education shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
可以看到,上市公司持有巴恩斯&贵族教育股份总数的42%。很难确定,但这表明它们存在着纠缠在一起的业务利益。这可能是一种战略性持股,因此值得关注这一领域的所有权变化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Barnes & Noble Education (at least 2 which are a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。比如,不断存在的投资风险。我们已经发现了与巴恩斯&贵族教育有关的3个警告信号(至少有2个有点令人不快),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。