ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 11% Loss Over the Past Year
ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 11% Loss Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies ZipRecruiter's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构拥有量显著高,这意味着ZipRecruiter的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
- 总共有7位投资者拥有该公司的控制权,拥有53%的股份。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
If you want to know who really controls ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着ZipRecruiter,Inc.(纽交所:ZIP),那么您将不得不看一下其股东注册情况。持有最大股份的是机构,占有52%。也就是说,如果股价上涨,这个群体将获得最大利益(或者在股市下跌时损失最大)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 14% increase in the share price after a year of 11% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
机构投资者可能会欢迎上周股价上涨14%,这是一年来11%亏损之后,收益可能开始趋势提高的迹象。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ZipRecruiter.
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于ZipRecruiter的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZipRecruiter?
机构持股对我们揭示了关于ZipRecruiter的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ZipRecruiter. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ZipRecruiter, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在ZipRecruiter中拥有相当大的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票,他们对其持有看好。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能出错。如果两位大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查ZipRecruiter的过去盈利轨迹(见下文)。当然,也请记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ZipRecruiter. Our data shows that Siegel Family Trust is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.1%.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体拥有重要影响力。 我们注意到对于ZipRecruiter,对冲基金并没有意义的投资。 我们的数据显示,Siegel Family Trust是最大的股东,持有14%的流通股份。 第二和第三大股东分别是BlackRock,Inc.和The Vanguard Group,Inc.,他们都持有8.1%的股份。
We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前7名股东拥有超过一半的股份登记册,还有一些小股东来平衡较大股东的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of ZipRecruiter
ZipRecruiter的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in ZipRecruiter, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$36m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告说,内部持有ZipRecruiter, Inc.的股份。这是一家大公司,因此看到这种程度的一致性是好的。内部人士持有价值3600万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内部一致性问题,您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在购买或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in ZipRecruiter. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,在ZipRecruiter持有23%的股份。虽然这个群体不能必然左右公司的决定,但肯定会对公司的运营产生实质影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 7.7% stake in ZipRecruiter. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股权投资公司持有ZipRecruiter 7.7% 的股份。 这表明他们可能在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。 有时我们会看到股权投资公司长期持有,但一般来说,他们投资时间较短,而且正如名称所示,并不怎么投资于公共公司。 一段时间后,他们可能会寻求出售并将资本重新配置到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有该公司14%的股份。私人公司可能是相关方。有时候内部人士通过持有私人公司而对公开公司产生兴趣,而不是以个人身份拥有。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但这值得作为进一步研究的一个方向。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with ZipRecruiter (at least 2 which are a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然值得考虑持有公司的不同群体,但有其他更重要的因素。 比如,要考虑投资风险的不断出现。 我们已经识别出ZipRecruiter的4个警示信号(至少有2个有点不愉快) ,了解它们应该成为您的投资流程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。