Following a 15% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Ready Capital Corporation (NYSE:RC) Institutional Owners
Following a 15% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Ready Capital Corporation (NYSE:RC) Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Ready Capital implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构在ready capital中的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响
- 前25大股东拥有该公司47%的股份。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ready Capital Corporation (NYSE:RC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制着ready capital公司(纽交所: RC),重要的是了解该企业的所有权结构。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司58%的所有权。换句话说,这个组织最有可能从他们对该公司的投资中获益最多(或者损失最惨)。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 8.3% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 15%.
机构投资者会因上周股价上涨8.3%而感到高兴,因为他们一年的损失已经累计达到令人失望的15%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ready Capital, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究每一类ready capital的所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ready Capital?
机构投资持股告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ready Capital. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ready Capital, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在ready capital中持有相当数量的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时候机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。 如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,很常见会看到股价大跌。 因此,值得检查ready capital的过去收入轨迹(如下所示)。 当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ready Capital. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 3.6% of the company stock.
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ready Capital. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 3.6% of the company stock.
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Ready Capital
Ready Capital 的内部股份所有情况。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that Ready Capital Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$12m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们的信息表明,ready capital公司内部人士拥有公司不到1%的股份。 请记住这是一家大公司,内部人士拥有价值1200万美元的股票。绝对价值可能比比例股份更重要。 看到董事会成员拥有股份是件好事,但值得注意的是,是否这些内部人士一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
私募股权公司在First Bank持有14%的股份。这意味着他们可以在关键政策决策上发挥影响力。有些人可能会喜欢这一点,因为私募股权有时会成为追责管理的激进派。但其他时候,私募股权则是出售股份,将公司公开上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Ready Capital you should be aware of.
尽管考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是很值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。以实例来说:我们发现Ready Capital存在2个警示信号,你应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。