share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU) With 81% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU) With 81% Ownership

机构投资者对DocuSign, Inc.(纳斯达克: DOCU)持有81%的股权,押注相当大。
Simply Wall St ·  11/10 09:58

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in DocuSign implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构在DocuSign的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响
  • 23位最大股东持有General Mills公司50%的业务。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。机构拥有81%的股份,在公司中占有最多的股份。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最大(或者如果有下降,将损失最多)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 12% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 94% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

作为结果,公司股价上周上涨12%,机构投资者获得了最大的回报。股东的一年回报率目前达到94%,上周的涨幅就像锦上添花一般。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DocuSign, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究一下docusign每种所有者,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqGS:DOCU Ownership Breakdown November 10th 2024
纳斯达克:DOCU所有权分布2024年11月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DocuSign?

机构持股比例对DocuSign有何启示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that DocuSign does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at DocuSign's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,docusign确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的相当部分。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过这支股票,并且他们对其评价很高。但就像其他投资者一样,他们也可能犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下docusign的下方盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:DOCU Earnings and Revenue Growth November 10th 2024
纳斯达克纳斯达克公司:docusign盈利和营业收入增长 2024年11月10日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in DocuSign. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.2% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 2.6% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会共同影响董事会决定。对于docusign,对冲基金没有持有很多股份。目前,Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股东,持有11%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股东,拥有7.2%的普通股,State Street全球顾问公司持有公司股份的约2.6%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 23 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更详细的所有权数据显示,前23大股东共拥有50%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东占多数。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of DocuSign

DocuSign的内部股东

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that DocuSign, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$160m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息显示,docusign公司内部人士拥有公司不到1%的股份。 由于公司规模如此之大,我们不会期望内部人员拥有大量股票。 他们总共拥有16000万美元的股票。 在这种情况下,看看这些内部人员是在买入还是卖出可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DocuSign. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

由于占有18%的股份,一般公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对docusign有一定的影响力。 虽然这一持股比例可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不协调,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - DocuSign has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,风险 - docusign有1个警示信号,我们认为您应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发