Houlihan Lokey, Inc.'s (NYSE:HLI) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over Last Week
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.'s (NYSE:HLI) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Houlihan Lokey's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构持股大幅增加意味着华利安的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 前20名股东持有该公司51%的股权。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (NYSE:HLI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下华利安(纽约证券交易所: HLI)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有实力。我们可以看到机构在公司中拥有77%的股权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最多(或者如果出现下行,则损失最大)。
Last week's 11% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 88% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周股价上涨11%,这意味着机构投资者处于正面的位置,尽管公司表现出了强劲的长期趋势。目前一年的投资回报率为88%,而上周的涨幅更是令人欢迎。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Houlihan Lokey.
让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东对华利安能告诉我们什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Houlihan Lokey?
机构持股告诉我们什么关于华利安?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Houlihan Lokey does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Houlihan Lokey, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,华利安确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的很大一部分股票。这可能表明公司在投资者社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。因为有时候他们也会犯错。如果两位大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,很常见看到股价大跌。因此,值得检查华利安的过去盈利轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Houlihan Lokey is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.4% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.2% of common stock, and EARNEST Partners, LLC holds about 4.7% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Scott Adelson is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Houlihan Lokey is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.4% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.2% of common stock, and EARNESt Partners, LLC holds about 4.7% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Scott Adelson is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记簿来看,我们可以看到前20名股东控制了51%的所有权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有绝对控制权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Houlihan Lokey
Insider Ownership Of Houlihan Lokey
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Houlihan Lokey, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$746m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告,内部持有华利安公司的股份。 这是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员共拥有价值74600万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 我们有时会对他们是在买入还是卖出感兴趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Houlihan Lokey. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在华利安公司持有17%的股份。 虽然这个群体不一定能左右决策,但肯定会对公司的运行产生实质影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。