Institutions Profited After Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CARE) Market Cap Rose US$57m Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most
Institutions Profited After Carter Bankshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CARE) Market Cap Rose US$57m Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Carter Bankshares indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 40% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Carter Bankshares is 44%
- 卡特银行股份的个人投资者拥有 considerable 的所有权,意味着他们共同在管理和业务策略上拥有更大的发言权
- 25家投资者持有公司的多数股权,占有40%的所有权。
- 卡特银行股份的机构投资比例为 44%
A look at the shareholders of Carter Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CARE) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看卡特银行股份有限公司(NASDAQ:CARE)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。拥有最大股份的群体是个人投资者,拥有 52% 的所有权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最大(或者如果市场出现下行,则损失也最大)。
While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$57m market cap gain, institutions too had a 44% share in those profits.
尽管个人投资者是上周5700万美元市值增长中受益最多的一群,但机构也在这些利润中占有44%的份额。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Carter Bankshares.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关卡特银行股的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Carter Bankshares?
机构所有权告诉我们有关卡特银行股的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Carter Bankshares. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Carter Bankshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在卡特银行股中拥有相当大的利益。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的声誉。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。 如果多家机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的卡特银行股票收益历史。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Carter Bankshares is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.3%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 5.1% of the stock.
卡特尔银行股份公司不由对冲基金持有。该公司最大的股东是黑石集团股份有限公司,拥有7.3%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约5.5%和5.1%的股票。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Carter Bankshares
卡特尔银行股份公司的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Carter Bankshares, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$18m worth of the US$451m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有卡特尔银行股份公司的一些股份。作为个人,内部人员共同拥有价值1800万美元的45100万美元公司股份。这至少表明某种一致性。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 52% of Carter Bankshares shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
普通大众,主要是个人投资者,共同持有卡特尔银行股份的52%。这种所有权水平使得来自更广泛公众的投资者具有影响关键政策决定的一定能力,例如董事会构成、高管薪酬以及股息支付比例。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Carter Bankshares that you should be aware of before investing here.
我觉得看清楚一个公司到底是谁拥有它非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了卡特银行股份的1个警示标志,你在投资之前应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。