John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:JMSB) Surges 22%; Individual Investors Who Own 46% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:JMSB) Surges 22%; Individual Investors Who Own 46% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Key Insights
主要见解
- John Marshall Bancorp's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 50% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insider ownership in John Marshall Bancorp is 12%
- 约翰·马歇尔银行的重要个人投资者所有权表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响
- 公司前25位股东持有50%的业务。
- John Marshall Bancorp的内部所有权为12%
A look at the shareholders of John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:JMSB) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 46% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看约翰·马歇尔银行公司(纳斯达克:JMSB)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最有影响力。在公司中持有最大股份的集团,准确地说大约46%,是个人投资者。换句话说,该集团面对最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$66m market cap gain, institutions too had a 41% share in those profits.
个别投资者是上周6600万美元市值增长中受益最大的群体,机构也在这些利润中拥有41%的份额。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of John Marshall Bancorp.
在下面的图表中,我们将聚焦约翰·马歇尔银行的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About John Marshall Bancorp?
机构持股告诉我们关于约翰·马歇尔银行的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in John Marshall Bancorp. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at John Marshall Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所见,机构投资者在约翰·马歇尔银行拥有相当大的股份。 这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。 但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。 如果多家机构同时改变他们对一支股票的观点,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看约翰·马歇尔银行以下的收益历史记录。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in John Marshall Bancorp. Our data shows that T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 6.0% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
对于约翰·马歇尔银行,对冲基金持有的股份不多。我们的数据显示,T. Rowe Price Group,Inc.是最大的股东,持有12%的流通股份。BlackRock,Inc.和The Vanguard Group,Inc.分别持有6.0%和4.4%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
尽管研究一家公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增添价值,但研究分析师建议以深入了解股票的预期表现也是一个好的做法。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师的覆盖,因此可能为人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of John Marshall Bancorp
约翰·马歇尔银行的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of John Marshall Bancorp, Inc.. Insiders have a US$40m stake in this US$349m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
内部持有John Marshall Bancorp, Inc.相当比例的股份。内部持有该公司34900万美元业务中4000万美元的股份。我们会说这显示了与股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是公司规模仍然相当小,一些内部可能是公司的创始人。您可以单击此处查看这些内部是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over John Marshall Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有46%股份的一般公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对John Marshall Bancorp具有一定影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand John Marshall Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that John Marshall Bancorp is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
考虑持有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解约翰·马歇尔银行,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,约翰·马歇尔银行在我们的投资分析中显示了1个警示信号,您应该知道...
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。