Xin Point Holdings Limited (HKG:1571) Adds HK$391m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 74% Stake in That Gain
Xin Point Holdings Limited (HKG:1571) Adds HK$391m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 74% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Xin Point Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 74% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Xiaoming Ma)
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 新点控股的重要内部持股表明对公司扩张存在固有利益
- 该公司74%的股份由单一股东(马晓明)持有
- 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Xin Point Holdings Limited (HKG:1571), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 74% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制着新点控股有限公司(HKG:1571),重要的是了解业务的所有权结构。个人内部人持有公司最大比例的股份,换句话说,该团体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或者损失最多)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$391m last week.
显然,在上周公司的市值上涨了39100万港币后,内部人受益最多。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Xin Point Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究新锋控股的每种所有者类型,首先从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Xin Point Holdings?
机构持股缺失对新锋控股有何影响?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Xin Point Holdings might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
有很多原因会导致机构不持有公司的股份。通常,规模较小、新上市的公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在该公司建立具有意义的头寸。另一方面,专业投资者可能会避免一家公司,因为他们认为这不是他们的最佳投资选择。新锋控股可能没有机构所期望的过去业绩,或者他们可能只是没有仔细研究该业务。
Xin Point Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Xiaoming Ma, with ownership of 74%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.3% and 0.2% of the stock.
鑫锋控股不是由对冲基金持有。该公司最大的股东是马晓明,持股74%。在拥有如此巨大的股权的情况下,我们推断他们对公司未来具有重要控制权。相比之下,第二和第三大股东大约持有6.3%和0.2%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Xin Point Holdings
鑫锋控股的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Xin Point Holdings Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of HK$4.0b, that means they have HK$2.9b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来内部持有超过新点控股有限公司一半的股份。这给了他们很大的权力。考虑到这家公司的市值为40亿港元,这意味着他们持有价值29亿港元的股份。看到这种投资水平是件好事。您可以在这里检查一下,看看这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众(包括零售投资者)持有该公司19%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。尽管这样的持股规模相当可观,但如果决策不与其他大股东一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With a stake of 6.3%, private equity firms could influence the Xin Point Holdings board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
拥有6.3%的股份,股权投资公司可能会影响新点控股的董事会。有时我们会看到股权投资公司长期持有,但一般来说,他们的投资视野更短,而且正如名称所示,他们不太投资公开公司。过一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售股份,并将资金重新投入其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Xin Point Holdings has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
尽管考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是很值得的,但有其他因素更为重要。以风险为例 - 新天点控股有一条警示标志,我们认为您应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。