share_log

Retail Investors Who Own 53% Along With Institutions Invested in Ouster, Inc. (NYSE:OUST) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Retail Investors Who Own 53% Along With Institutions Invested in Ouster, Inc. (NYSE:OUST) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

零售投资者和机构共同持有Ouster, Inc.(纽交所:OUST)的53%股份,在上周看到他们的持股价值增加
Simply Wall St ·  11/13 12:54

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Ouster indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 37% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • Ouster大量的零售投资者持有股份,表明他们在管理和业务策略上集体拥有更大的发言权。
  • 前25个股东持有该业务的37%。
  • 内部人士最近购买了股票。

A look at the shareholders of Ouster, Inc. (NYSE:OUST) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看Ouster, Inc. (纽交所: OUST)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。持有公司最多股份的群体,准确地说,大约53%,是零售投资者。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将最有利可图(或者在市场下跌时损失最严重)。

While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$126m market cap gain, institutions too had a 39% share in those profits.

尽管散户投资者是上周12600万美元市值增长中受益最多的群体,但机构也在这些利润中占有39%的份额。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ouster.

在下面的图表中,我们关注Ouster的不同持股群体。

big
NYSE:OUST Ownership Breakdown November 13th 2024
纽交所:OUSt 所有权结构 2024年11月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ouster?

机构持股告诉我们关于Ouster的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Ouster already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ouster, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Ouster已经在其股份登记中有机构持股。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的可信度。然而,依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证是值得警惕的。他们有时也会出错。如果两家大型机构投资者试图同时卖出股票,股票价格出现大幅下跌并不少见。因此,查看Ouster过去的盈利轨迹是有必要的(见下文)。当然,值得记住的是,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:OUST Earnings and Revenue Growth November 13th 2024
纽交所:OUSt 2024年11月的盈利与营业收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ouster. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 6.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.6% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Charles Pacala directly holds 1.5% of the total shares outstanding.

我们注意到对Ouster的对冲基金投资并不显著。 我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大股东,持有6.4%的流通股。 同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有5.6%和3.3%的流通股。 此外,公司CEO查尔斯·帕卡拉直接持有1.5%的流通股。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Ouster

Ouster的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Ouster, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$27m worth of the US$525m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人士在Ouster, Inc.中持有股票。内部人士作为个体,总共持有价值2700万美元的股份,而该公司的市值为52500万美元。这至少显示出一些一致性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 53% of Ouster. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公众——包括散户投资者——拥有Ouster 53%的股份。这种所有权使公众投资者在关键政策决策上拥有一定的影响力,比如董事会成员组成、执行薪酬和股息支付比例。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Ouster you should be aware of.

我发现了解一家公司到底由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 举个例子:我们发现了关于Ouster的3个警告信号,你应该注意这些。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发