Dah Sing Banking Group Limited's (HKG:2356) Last Week's 4.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Public Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Dah Sing Banking Group Limited's (HKG:2356) Last Week's 4.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Public Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
关键见解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Dah Sing Banking Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- Dah Sing Financial Holdings Limited owns 74% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 上市公司在大新银行集团拥有大量所有权,这表明它们在管理和业务战略方面集体拥有更大的发言权
- 大新金融控股有限公司拥有该公司 74% 的股份
- 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会
If you want to know who really controls Dah Sing Banking Group Limited (HKG:2356), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 74% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制着大新银行集团有限公司(HKG: 2356),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有74%所有权的上市公司。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
As a result, public companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by HK$436m.
结果,在市值下降4.36亿港元之后,上市公司整体上周遭受了最大的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Dah Sing Banking Group.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于大新银行集团的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dah Sing Banking Group?
关于大新银行集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Dah Sing Banking Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Dah Sing Banking Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,大新银行集团确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到大新银行集团的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。
Dah Sing Banking Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Dah Sing Financial Holdings Limited with 74% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.8% and 1.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
大新银行集团不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是大新金融控股有限公司,已发行股份的74%。这意味着他们对公司的未来拥有多数权益控制权。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的2.8%和1.1%。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。
Insider Ownership Of Dah Sing Banking Group
大新银行集团的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Dah Sing Banking Group Limited in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own HK$33m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己的名义拥有大新银行集团有限公司不到1%的股份。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值3300万港元的股票。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。你可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Dah Sing Banking Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
大新银行集团拥有 18% 的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对大新银行集团有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 74% of the Dah Sing Banking Group shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我们可以看到,上市公司持有大新银行集团74%的已发行股份。我们无法确定,但这很可能是一个战略利益。这些企业可能相似,也可以合作。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Dah Sing Banking Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例-大新银行集团有一个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。