Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Surged S$80m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Surged S$80m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over Haw Par by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Haw Par is 29%
- 私营公司对Haw Par的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
- 共有4位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为54%
- Haw Par的机构所有权为29%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Haw Par Corporation Limited (SGX:H02), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制了虎豹有限公司(SGX: H02),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为37%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 3.3% gain.
结果,私营公司是上周3.3%涨幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haw Par.
在下图中,我们放大了Haw Par的不同所有权组。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haw Par?
关于Haw Par,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
Haw Par already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Haw Par's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Haw Par已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Haw Par的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多内容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Haw Par. The company's largest shareholder is Wee Investments Pte Ltd, with ownership of 28%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.8% of the stock.
对冲基金在Haw Par的股票不多。该公司的最大股东是Wee Investments Pte Ltd,其所有权为28%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约10%和9.8%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前四名股东控制着公司一半以上的股份,这意味着该集团对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。
Insider Ownership Of Haw Par
Haw Par 的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our information suggests that Haw Par Corporation Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$14m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息表明,虎豹有限公司内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。但是,我们确实注意到,内部人士有可能通过私营公司或其他公司结构获得间接利益。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值1400万新元的股票。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Haw Par. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有Haw Par32%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 37%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司37%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,在其中一家私营公司中拥有权益,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Haw Par you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了 Haw Par 的 1 个警告标志,你应该注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。