Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 69% of the Company
Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 69% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Provident Financial Services' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 鉴于机构在股票中持有大部分股权, provident financial services的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响
- 前15大股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
Every investor in Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 69% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位投资者都应该意识到纽交所:PFS的股东中最强大的股东群体。持有最多股份的是机构,拥有69%的股权。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Provident Financial Services.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了对 Provident Financial Services 不同所有权集团的观察。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Provident Financial Services?
机构持有权告诉我们有关 Provident Financial Services 的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Provident Financial Services already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Provident Financial Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Provident Financial Services 已经有机构在股东名册上。事实上,他们在公司拥有一定比例的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图出售某只股票,股价大跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查 Provident Financial Services 的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Provident Financial Services. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对于Provident Financial Services,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。BlackRock,Inc.目前是该公司最大的股东,持有13%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股份的11%和5.9%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前15名股东在公司中拥有50%的组合持股,这表明没有单一的股东对公司拥有重大控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Provident Financial Services
提供者金融服务内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can see that insiders own shares in Provident Financial Services, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$95m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以看到,内部持有人拥有Provident Financial Services股票。这是一家大公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性是很好的。内部持有人拥有价值9500万美元的股份(以当前价格计算)。看到内部持有人有这种投资水平是一件好事。您可以在这里检查,看看这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Provident Financial Services. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在Provident Financial Services持有28%的股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Provident Financial Services (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.
我发现查看公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如风险。每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现了provident financial services的5个警告信号(其中1个让我们有点不舒服!)你应该了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。