Institutional Investors in Performant Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PFMT) Lost 23% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Institutional Investors in Performant Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PFMT) Lost 23% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Key Insights
关键见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Performant Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 6 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 各机构对Performant Financial的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
- 前6名股东拥有公司53%的股份
- 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Performant Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PFMT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制了Performant Financial Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:PFMT),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有59%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 23% in value last week. However, the 23% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降23%的机构投资者。但是,23%的股东一年回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Performant Financial.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Performant Financial的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Performant Financial?
关于Performant Financial,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
Performant Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Performant Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Performant Financial已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Performant Financial的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 20% of Performant Financial shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Prescott Group Capital Management L.L.C. is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 5.9% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Simeon Kohl is the owner of 0.5% of the company's shares.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。看来对冲基金拥有Performant Financial20%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变革。我们的数据显示,普雷斯科特集团资本管理有限责任公司是最大股东,已发行股份的20%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约13%和5.9%的股份。此外,首席执行官西蒙·科尔持有该公司0.5%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了进一步的挖掘,发现6个最大的股东占了大股东的53%左右,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,因此在某种程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Performant Financial
绩效金融的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Performant Financial Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$263m, and insiders have US$15m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有Performant Financial Corporation的股份。它的市值仅为2.63亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值1500万美元的股票。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Performant Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Performant Financial拥有13%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成,对Performant Financial有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Performant Financial that you should be aware of before investing here.
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们发现了Performant Financial的1个警告信号,在这里投资之前,你应该注意这个信号。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。