Despite Recent Sales, Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY) Insiders Still Control 33% of the Company
Despite Recent Sales, Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY) Insiders Still Control 33% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Expensify's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 内部人似乎对Expensify的增长有着极大的利益,这可以从他们庞大的所有权看出
- 前12名股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
Every investor in Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 33% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY)的每位投资者都应意识到最强大的股东群体。我们看到个别内部人拥有公司33%的所有权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将获益最多(或者如果出现下跌,则将损失最多)。
Even though insiders have sold shares recently, the group owns the most numbers of shares in the company and as a result benefitted the most after market cap rose US$78m last week.
尽管近期内部人士出售了股份,但该集团在公司中拥有最多股份,因此在市值上周上涨了7800万美元后获得了最大收益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Expensify, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解Expensify的每一种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Expensify?
机构投资机构的持有情况对Expensify有什么启示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Expensify. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Expensify's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Expensify中拥有相当大的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好不要过分依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。他们有时也会犯错。当多家机构共同持有一支股票时,总会存在他们在 '拥挤交易' 中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在历史没有增长记录的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看Expensify的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更复杂的。
Expensify is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Steve McLaughlin with 13% of shares outstanding. David Barrett is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and Witold Stankiewicz holds about 7.3% of the company stock. David Barrett, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
Expensify不是由对冲基金拥有。从我们的数据中可以看出,最大的股东是史蒂夫·麦克劳克林,持有13%的股份。大卫·巴雷特是第二大股东,拥有7.8%的普通股,维托尔德·斯坦凯维奇持有约7.3%的公司股票。大卫·巴雷特是第二大股东,也是首席执行官。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
辛蒙斯第一国家银行内部所有权
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Expensify
Expensify内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Expensify, Inc.. Insiders have a US$83m stake in this US$250m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来,内部持有Expensify,Inc.相当大比例的股份。内部人士在这家价值25000万美元的公司中持有8300万美元的股份。看到内部人士对业务如此投入真是太棒了。也许值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Expensify. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在Expensify持有31%的股份。尽管这一所有权规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不协调,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 5.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股权投资机构拥有5.3%的股权,能够在塑造企业战略方面发挥作用,重点是价值创造。 一些投资者可能会因此而感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励帮助市场看到公司价值的策略。 或者,这些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Expensify better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Expensify that you should be aware of.
总是值得考虑公司股东群体的差异。但要更好地了解Expensify,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如,我们已经确定了Expensify的4个警示信号,您应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。