share_log

After the Recent Decline, Tomson Group Limited (HKG:258) CEO Feng Hsu's Holdings Have Lost 8.6% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Tomson Group Limited (HKG:258) CEO Feng Hsu's Holdings Have Lost 8.6% of Their Value

在最近下跌后,汤臣集团有限公司(HKG:258)首席执行官徐峰的控股市值已损失8.6%。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/15 07:20

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over Tomson Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 汤臣集团的重大内部控制意味着对公司增长的利益关联
  • 共有2位投资者拥有江苏长青新材料科技51%的所有权。
  • 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。

A look at the shareholders of Tomson Group Limited (HKG:258) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 66% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看汤臣集团有限公司(HKG:258)的股东可以告诉我们哪个团体最强大。持有公司最多股份的团体,精确来说,大约占66%,是内部个人。换句话说,该团体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by HK$455m.

因此,内部人士作为一个整体在市值减少了45500万港元后承受了最高损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tomson Group, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨汤臣集团每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
SEHK:258 Ownership Breakdown November 14th 2024
香港证券交易所:258 所有权分布 2024年11月14日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tomson Group?

缺乏机构持有量对汤臣集团意味着什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Tomson Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

机构不持有某只股票的原因有很多。最常见的原因是该公司相对于管理的基金规模太小,因此机构没有必要仔细审视这家公司。或者,可能有某些因素使机构投资者远离该公司。汤臣集团可能没有机构寻找的那种过往业绩,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究这个业务。

big
SEHK:258 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 14th 2024
港交所:258 盈利和营业收入增长 2024年11月14日

Tomson Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Feng Hsu with 36% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 15%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that two of the top three shareholders are also Senior Key Executive and Vice Chairman, respectively, once again pointing to significant ownership by company insiders.

汤臣集团不被对冲基金持有。通过我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是CEO徐峰,持有36%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有15%的流通股份。请注意,前三大股东中有两位也是高级关键执行官和副董事长,这再次指向公司内部人士的显著持股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

南京证券复合材料公司内部所有权情况

Insider Ownership Of Tomson Group

汤臣集团的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Tomson Group Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own HK$3.2b worth of shares in the HK$4.9b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人士持有汤臣集团有限公司的绝大多数股份。这意味着他们可以集体为公司做出决策。这意味着他们在这家市值49亿港元的公司中持有价值32亿港元的股份。这是相当重要的。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能想要(免费)了解他们是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众,包括普通投资者,在公司拥有27%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.4%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们的数据表明,私营公司持有该公司6.4%的股份。私营公司可能是相关方。有时,内部人员通过持有私营公司的股份而非以个人身份对一家上市公司有利害关系。虽然很难得出广泛的结论,但值得作为进一步研究的一个方面。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tomson Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Tomson Group you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.

思考拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但为了更好地理解汤臣集团,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如:我们发现汤臣集团有3个警告信号,你应该关注其中的2个,令人为之担忧。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发