Towngas Smart Energy Company Limited's (HKG:1083) Market Cap Dropped HK$418m Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt
Towngas Smart Energy Company Limited's (HKG:1083) Market Cap Dropped HK$418m Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Towngas Smart Energy by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The largest shareholder of the company is The Hong Kong and China Gas Company Limited with a 68% stake
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 公共公司对于towngas psgsb的重要控制意味着一般公众拥有更多权力来影响管理和治理决策
- 公司的最大股东是香港中华煤气有限公司,持有68%的股份
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Towngas Smart Energy Company Limited (HKG:1083) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 68% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看下towngas psgsb能源公司(HKG:1083)的股东,我们就能知道哪个集团最有实力。 公共公司持有公司的最大股份,占68%。 换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最多)。
As market cap fell to HK$11b last week, public companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
随着市值于上周跌至110亿港元,公共公司可能面临的损失比公司的任何其他股东群体都要高。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Towngas Smart Energy, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究towngas psgsb能源的每种所有者类型,首先从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Towngas Smart Energy?
机构持股告诉我们什么关于towngas psgsb能源?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Towngas Smart Energy. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Towngas Smart Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在towngas psgsb能源中拥有相当数量的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像任何人一样。 当多家机构持有一只股票时,总会存在他们参与的“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。 在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。 您可以在下面看到towngas psgsb能源的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更为复杂的。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Towngas Smart Energy. The company's largest shareholder is The Hong Kong and China Gas Company Limited, with ownership of 68%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 3.2% and 1.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Affinity Equity Partners Limited and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
对Towngas Smart Energy来说,对冲基金持有的股份不多。该公司最大的股东是香港中华煤气有限公司,持股比例为68%。这意味着他们对该公司未来的控制权。分别持有股份的3.2%和1.3%,Affinity Equity Partners Limited和The Vanguard Group, Inc.分别是第二和第三大股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Towngas Smart Energy
Towngas Smart Energy的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that Towngas Smart Energy Company Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$53m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,towngas psgsb的内部股东拥有公司不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部股东拥有价值5300万港元的股份。绝对价值可能比比例份额更重要。可以说,最近的买卖行为同样重要。您可以 点击这里 查看内部人员是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in Towngas Smart Energy. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众通常是个人投资者,在towngas psgsb持有24%的股份。虽然这个群体可能无法左右决策,但肯定能对公司的运营产生真实影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 68% of the Towngas Smart Energy shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我们可以看到上市的公共公司持有towngas psgsb发行股份的68%。很难确定,但这表明他们存在交织的业务利益。这可能是一个战略性股份,因此值得关注所有所有权变化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Towngas Smart Energy better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Towngas Smart Energy (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
考虑不同股东持有公司股份总是值得的。但要更好地了解towngas psgsb,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了towngas psgsb的3个警示信号(其中1个有点令人担忧!),在投资之前您应该注意这些。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。