Pulse Biosciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PLSE) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Robert Duggan Sees Holdings Value Fall by 4.8% Following Recent Drop
Pulse Biosciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PLSE) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Robert Duggan Sees Holdings Value Fall by 4.8% Following Recent Drop
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Pulse Biosciences' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- Robert Duggan owns 69% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 内部人士似乎对pulse biosciences的增长有很大的利益关系,因为他们的持股比例相当可观。
- 罗伯特·杜根拥有该公司69%的股份。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLSE) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看pulse biosciences, inc.(纳斯达克:PLSE)的股东,可以让我们知道哪个群体最有影响力。我们可以看到,个人内部人士在公司中拥有71%的股份。这就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获得最大的好处(或者在下跌时损失最多)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.8%.
上周,内部人士遭受了最大的损失,因为股票下跌了4.8%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pulse Biosciences, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地研究一下pulse biosciences的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pulse Biosciences?
机构持有情况告诉我们关于pulse biosciences什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pulse Biosciences. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pulse Biosciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在pulse biosciences中拥有相当份额。这在某种程度上表明了专业投资者的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时候也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变了对某只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面pulse biosciences的盈利历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pulse Biosciences. Our data suggests that Robert Duggan, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 69%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 1.9% and 1.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我们注意到对pulse biosciences的对冲基金没有显著投资。我们的数据显示,罗伯特·杜根(Robert Duggan),也是公司的顶级关键高管,持有最多的股份,达到69%。当内部联系人持有大量公司股票时,投资者会认为这是一个积极的信号,因为这表明内部人员愿意让他们的财富与公司的未来绑在一起。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有1.9%和1.5%的流通股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
尽管我们需要研究一个公司的机构所有权数据是有道理的,但也需要研究分析师的情绪来了解市场趋势。我们目前没有发现任何关于该股票的分析师报道,所以该公司可能不受广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Pulse Biosciences
pulse biosciences的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Pulse Biosciences, Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of US$1.1b, that means insiders have a whopping US$760m worth of shares in their own names. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.
内部人士似乎持有超过一半的pulse biosciences, Inc. 股票。这给了他们很多权力。考虑到它的市值为11亿美金,这意味着内部人士持有的股票价值高达76000万美元。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。你可能想知道他们是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Pulse Biosciences. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众,通常是个体投资者,持有pulse biosciences 20%的股份。这种规模的持有,虽然相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Pulse Biosciences (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
我发现研究一个公司究竟由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获取洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解我们发现的有关pulse biosciences的3个警告信号(其中1个可能严重)。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。