TSS, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSSI) Surges 33%; Individual Investors Who Own 55% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
TSS, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSSI) Surges 33%; Individual Investors Who Own 55% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in TSS indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 12 shareholders own 45% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 个人投资者在TSS持有相当大的股权,这表明他们在管理和业务策略方面有更大的发言权
- 前12大股东拥有公司45%的股份
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
If you want to know who really controls TSS, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSSI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道谁真正控制着TSS, Inc. (纳斯达克代码:TSSI),那么您需要查看其股东登记册的构成。持有公司最多股数的组别,准确地说是约55%的个人投资者。换句话说,该组别最有可能(或最有可能)从自己投资到公司中获得最多回报(或损失最大)。
Following a 33% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but insiders who own 32% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上周股价上涨33%,个人投资者获利最多,但持有32%股票的内部人员也有望从此次增长中获益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TSS.
在下面的图表中,我们放大查看了TSS的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TSS?
没有机构持有权益意味着什么?
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
机构不拥有股票的原因有多种解释。最常见的是公司相对于管理基金过小,因此机构不必仔细审查公司。也有可能是基金经理人不持有股票,因为他们不确信该股票表现良好。机构投资者可能并不认为该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的过去营业收入表现。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of TSS, for yourself, below.
公司没有机构持有股份可能有各种原因。通常,小型、新上市公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理无法在公司建立有意义的头寸。 也可能是基金经理之所以不持有该股票,是因为他们并不认为它会表现良好。机构投资者可能认为该公司的历史增长不尽人意,或者可能存在其他因素。 您可以自行查看TSS的过去营业收入表现。
It would appear that 13% of TSS shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that MHW Capital Management, LLC is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.3% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Darryll Dewan is the owner of 1.2% of the company's shares.
看起来TSS股票中有13%由对冲基金控制。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者引发改变以为股东创造近期价值。我们的数据显示,MHW Capital Management, LLC是拥有13%流通股的最大股东。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的8.3%和6.6%。此外,CEO Darryll Dewan拥有公司股份的1.2%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 12 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前12大股东集体持有不到注册股份的一半,这表明有一大群小股东,没有任何一家股东占多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
尽管研究一家公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增添价值,但研究分析师建议以深入了解股票的预期表现也是一个好的做法。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师的覆盖,因此可能为人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of TSS
TSS内部股权所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of TSS, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$291m, and insiders have US$93m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
TSS,Inc.似乎有相当比例的内部人持有。其市值仅为29100万美元,内部人员名下的股份价值为9300万美元。我们认为这表明与股东利益保持一致,但值得注意的是公司规模仍然相当小;一些内部人员可能是公司的创始人。您可以单击此处查看这些内部人是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 55% of TSS shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
普通大众,主要由个人投资者组成,共同持有TSS股票的55%。凭借这一所有权,散户投资者可以共同在影响股东回报的决策中发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使投票权,对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并进行投票。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for TSS that you should be aware of before investing here.
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,在这里投资之前,我们发现了TSS的3个警示信号,你应该注意。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。